I'm skeptical that moving any established scoring wing to center is going to provide positive results.
I'd prefer to see them attempt to use their wing depth to buoy a lesser talented center.
Agree with you 100%
Don't think we are going to get the results we are hoping for from MSL at Center. He's played the game up and down the walls the last 15-20+ years, now, a week to 10 days before the season starts he's going to learn the nuances of being a teams #1 center?
I hope I'm wrong, but I'm not expecting anything good to come out of it.
hasn't been that impressive since he's come here.
He's been OK, but far from impressive.
OverTheCap;90505027[B said:]MSL has the vision and passing ability that many centers possess; Nash does not.[/B] Nash should just focus on scoring some goals right now, he doesn't need the added distraction of learning how to play a new position.
Agree. I think the coaching staff agrees too, but did any center really step up in preseason or TC to earn that right? I don't think so. I think that's why they're making the move to use MSL there. He wasn't awful in the preseason games...
I'd rather see Moore get utilized more, but do understand posters' hesitance at that. On the other hand, Moore stepped up and played big minutes for us in the Habs series and did not look out of place at all.
seriously?
see 2013 & 14 playoffs
37 4 11 15 2 8 125 3.0 really ?
um..... any questions.
Agreed.
But instinctual positioning on the ice and overall responsibilities in both the offensive and defensive zones are different than a wingers.
Don't care how smart a player is, moreso for the better players in the game, it's an instinctual sport where you just know where to go/be in all three zones.
Asking a star winger to take over the teams #1 center spot on such short notice is asking for trouble.
Not impressive in the playoffs, sure, regular season, he has been our best forward.
He was on pace for over 40 goals in the shortened season how is that not impressive?
Not impressive in the playoffs, sure, regular season, he has been our best forward.
i didnt clarify.
reg season hes been good.
playoffs hes been pretty much raw arse.
averages out to not impressive at all though....
he will not be our best forward this reg season pretty sure of that.
21 in 44 games
that equates to 36 goals in 76 games.
That assumes he would have maintained the pace he was on.
Nice no question. But that's what I am expecting from him every year.
30-35 goals.
For his skill set, amount of TOI at ES and on PP, there's no reason he shouldn't be doing this every year.
Playing to your averages does not impress me.
Those being a dominant net front presence, and he has a good IQ of where to be in the offensive zone. Limit his ES time, and give him PP time. Glass and Malone should never be in the lineup at the same time? Disagree. They play very different games. Their only similarity is their size, which you've discounted if it doesn't come with anything else.
Play the matchups. This is going to be a rough and tumble game. The Blues will take some penalties, the Rangers will need to capitalize on the PP. This is the sole reason of my thinking of putting Malone in for this game.
I'd take that bet, assuming he stays healthy.
best is a subjective term.
our best forward last year was zuke.
this year msl, zuke and kreider will all outscore nick rash.
id even make a better bet with you.
nash wont outscore mcdonagh this season.
best is a subjective term.
our best forward last year was zuke.
this year msl, zuke and kreider will all outscore nick rash.
id even make a better bet with you.
nash wont outscore mcdonagh this season.
I'd take that bet, assuming he stays healthy.
So a 39+ goal pace. You do realize full seasons are 82 games, right? That would put him in the league top 5 every season practically.
Playing to his average, which is far above most others averages is not a bad thing. 30-35 goals in this day and age is a lot. If he can pot over 35, that's a really big season. This isn't the 80's and people need to get over that. 30 goal scorers are rare. 40 goal scorers are practically non-existent. 50 goal scorers are the elite of the elite.
Would Crosby playing to his averages not impress you either? Ridiculous statement.
I'm quoting this for posterity so you can't edit it out. This Nash hate is ridiculous.
best is a subjective term.
our best forward last year was zuke.
this year msl, zuke and kreider will all outscore nick rash.
id even make a better bet with you.
nash wont outscore mcdonagh this season.
you do realize that not evey player plays in all 82 games and that Nash had missed 4 games in 48 and probably would have missed a few others. The fact is, Nash has played in 82 games ONE time in his career.
Which means that the 39 goal pace is incorrect.
Goals per 82 games is not a stat to hang your hat on. What he does in the first 17 games this year added to the 26 he scored in 65 games last year means jack ****.
Crosby being an elite level talent playing to his avreages to me is not impressive. It's expected.
Crosby upping his totals to 140+ THAT would be impressive. Posting 25-40 goals to go with 60-70 assists is what I expect. Seeing him post those totals while impressive for most players is an average season for Sidney.
Just as much as I expect 50 goals from AO and Stammer. In the grand scheme of things, those totals are impressive, when matching those totals up to past seasons for those two players, it's not impressive.
Nash can impress me by posting 70+ points this season. If he plays in 75 games or 82 games.
A player with skill set and size that he has, pulling the kind of scratch he's pulling, he should be AVERAGING 70+ pts a year.
best is a subjective term.
our best forward last year was zuke.
this year msl, zuke and kreider will all outscore nick rash.
id even make a better bet with you.
nash wont outscore mcdonagh this season.