Texcanuck
Registered User
- Nov 28, 2017
- 1,191
- 1,041
Gotta love you Tone!! Such a homer!!!Sarnia 6 Petes 4
Sarnia 5 Fronts 2
Sarnia 7 Ottawa 4
Gotta love you Tone!! Such a homer!!!Sarnia 6 Petes 4
Sarnia 5 Fronts 2
Sarnia 7 Ottawa 4
It'll be a tough decision for Sinclair but I'm still on the side of trading Josling & McGregor. You *Should* be able to get quite the haul for them. McGregor is a top 10 C in the O & his elite 2Way play is so valuable. Josling is on a torrid pace right now so his value is rising alot.
So far this year OAs have gone for -
Garreffa ~ Three 3rds
Hawel ~ two 2nds, 3rd, 15th
Paquette (D) ~ 2nd, two 3rds, 5th
Hawel is the one i look at the most. He had 78 Points last year playing on a stacked Storm team. McGregor had 77 on a way lesser Sting team. And as i noted before he brings that great 2Way game that every coach wants on there team.
Yep!! And if kids like Mast, Voit, O’Donnell are the kind of players we can attract, then bring on the picks...Speaking of draft picks, the Sting are missing some high draft picks according to the ohl database.
2020 3rd
2021 2nd
We could recoupe those picks & possibly add another 2nd if we move our better OAs
It makes no sense ??i found this interesting
Ryan Pyette
@RyanatLFPress
·
2m
All the Sarnia Sting will say officially is they claimed a goalie off waivers in the past week. But put 2+2 together and it's ex-Oil King Dylan Myskiw, who the Knights had their eye on for a while.
It's more of a big middle finger to London lol. Like if u want him then you'll give us something for him.Sign him and trade him for a draft pick or whatever, I don’t see the problem with that , don’t see langevin or gaudreau being shipped out for an OA
It’s smart, I’m sure hunters would do the sameIt's more of a big middle finger to London lol. Like if u want him then you'll give us something for him.
I like it because it's London but Hunter must be pretty pissed off at Sinclair lol.
Or he doesn’t report lolI love it. Smart move for Sinclair. Turn nothing into something. Who cares what the pick is that we will get in return. Pick is a pick!
I love it. Smart move for Sinclair. Turn nothing into something. Who cares what the pick is that we will get in return. Pick is a pick!
Why would London ever give a pick? They'd be a lot smarter to say okay you can have him, knowing SAR isn't going to use him. Then he'd go back on waivers and the only teams ahead of LDN in the waiver wire are KGN/NB/MISS/GUE and none of them are taking an OA goalie
It has been discussed for at least 2 years, but not implemented as of yet.wait a second...Was it just talk or did the rule change so that goalies do not count towards your 3 OA's?? Why do I remember this being at least discussed??
It has been discussed for at least 2 years, but not implemented as of yet.
Or Sarnia gas waiver priority and London wants him before someone else snags him (like Sudbury who needs a G)It's more of a big middle finger to London lol. Like if u want him then you'll give us something for him.
I like it because it's London but Hunter must be pretty pissed off at Sinclair lol.
I would say more like a blind loyal fan.LOL!!!!Gotta love you Tone!! Such a homer!!!
Which Forwards have been healthy scratches lately? Would any of those kids going to be sent down to Junior B?
Pretty impressive numbers for Myskew last year with a .914 save percentage and huge minutes .Sign him and trade him for a draft pick or whatever, I don’t see the problem with that , don’t see langevin or gaudreau being shipped out for an OA
I guess them working together could make sense. London has a oretty high waiver claim as of now ahead of other teams that need goalies.Or Sarnia gas waiver priority and London wants him before someone else snags him (like Sudbury who needs a G)
no GM is in the business of screwing another or you won’t get anywhere in the league. Sinclair and London likely working on this together. That’s my guess