Peat
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2016
- 29,467
- 25,319
I don't think they're going to do it, but imagine the hype that would go across this city if the team acquired Gibson tonight.
Pettersson and Jarry for Deslaurier and Gibson?
It'd be one way to help crash the forum for sure.
Incidentally, it's times like this I wish I had the gall to do an Eklund and make up rumours and charge people money for them. I'm not saying Kingerski/Rossi are doing that, but a child of two could spot we're probably making calls on Gibson, and not just because he's from Pittsburgh.
I actually think Gibson is a realistic target in terms of goalies that could be moved. I'm skeptical that the Penguins have the assets for him, but I don't doubt for a second his availability.
Apparently Carolina and Anaheim came to an agreement on a Gibson deal, but Carolina backed out. I have no doubts that Anaheim would trade him, I'm just not sure they'd trade him here. Personally, I'd be fine with emptying the prospect pool for Gibson because I think they can probably recoup most of what they gave up for Gibson in 3 years when they're rebuilding.
Wait, is there a valid Pens/Ducks rumor going around?
Wait, is there a valid Pens/Ducks rumor going around?
Zucker for Dvorak would make sense from a cost perspective, but I don't see why Arizona would do that. Don't really see what else Arizona makes sense for to us.
I guess Crouse's rights for Zucker? But why are they adding contracts. And we aren't adding picks to get rid of Zucker.
Kuemper for Jarry, balance a bit as needed.
Kuemper for Jarry, balance a bit as needed.
Oh boy he's stirring the pot
The more Kingerski talks about Gibson the more you should think about Fleury