I don't see why anybody wouldn't want JJs versatility. Better than our bottom 6 Forwards atm. Except for Rust, Maybe Hags.
He's also 34.
Jokinen is a good pick up. He can play center or LW, the two areas we are super light on at the moment.
If the Oilers sign him for less than 1.5, I think it's a huge opportunity missed to gain some depth for the season.
Yes he has and is very aware of it. He was right to let the UFA's go. It will be hard to bring g Horny back. If someone offers him a Bonino contract, I don't think we can afford him. But I would try and keep a spot for him like we are with Cullen, but Horny will probably be expensive.
I have no problem losing any of those guys if there was a decent deal there. Letting them walk is nonsensical.
I wonder if this has any effect on Sheary's potential deal in the sense that it's guaranteed Sheary doesn't get less than $2.25 million.
Rust is better on the right side, and Archibald and Kuhnhackl are also natural RWs.
I was saying Jokinen for 4th center. Much better option than Rowney. Rowney is essentially a faster, feistier Adams, but he's still not going to lead a scoring line.
And Cullen at 3C would be a mistake, unless it's a temporary thing until we acquire another center and he doesn't play a full season. Not even a half season.
Because whoever we get for 3C needs to be able to play 20 or so games at 2C. It's just reality of this team. That's a huge work load for someone that's 41 and played a **** ton of hockey already in the last 2 years.
Even if he could change positions easily he doesn't have enough skill for the 4C we'd want.
Archibald may turn into an ok bottom 6 scorer but will need someone to be able to make the plays. We could turn it into a great checking line but having some offensive threat on the 4th line has worked well for us.
huh? There's definitely some room to jump on JJ... but I don't think a "lack of skill" is one of the things to do it over.
3M for 3 years is my want for Sheary. Nothing more, nothing less for cap hit and years.
That looks about right. If Sheary regresses to be a 35-40 point guy, $3 million isn't terrible for that kind of production. And if he repeats his regular season performance from this year, it'll be a steal.
I just hope he doesn't get paid like you'd expect a 50-60 point guy to get paid, since he's only done that one time and there's no guarantee he'll do it again.
I'd rather the Pens bring back Orpik than Jokinen. He recently has been relegated to the wing because his skills at center have diminished. In the past two seasons, much of the Pens success has been a direct result of an infusion of youthful forwards who have been able to compliment our skillful and grittier players. The emergence of young skill; i.e..Sheary and Guentzal and young grit; Rust, Wilson, Kuhnhackl, Archibald; have been what this team needed. The Pens have been able to develop and obtain young forwards and now have a pipeline of forwards pushing to take the next step: this season it could be Sprong and ZAR, next Bluegar and Johnson, etc. They do not need a diminishing Jokinen taking ice time away from emerging potential.
Yeah the tricky part is he did it at a 71 pt pace with little PP production which is a huge number for him to point at in arbitration, even if just for a year.
Hopefully the Pens point out that he was dreadful for much of the playoffs, and that his numbers were a product of playing with Sidney Crosby.
I'd rather the Pens bring back Orpik than Jokinen. He recently has been relegated to the wing because his skills at center have diminished. In the past two seasons, much of the Pens success has been a direct result of an infusion of youthful forwards who have been able to compliment our skillful and grittier players. The emergence of young skill; i.e..Sheary and Guentzal and young grit; Rust, Wilson, Kuhnhackl, Archibald; have been what this team needed. The Pens have been able to develop and obtain young forwards and now have a pipeline of forwards pushing to take the next step: this season it could be Sprong and ZAR, next Bluegar and Johnson, etc. They do not need a diminishing Jokinen taking ice time away from emerging potential.