BlackAndGold87
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2017
- 1,161
- 698
More i think about it, maybe JR's shopping a Maatta or Dumoulin around to get that upper echelon LW'er he seems to be going after in conjuction with a 3C. Theres obviously the hybrid types in Duchene/Galchenyuk but i believe his Gal. interest was to play him @ LW. Friedman mentioned possible Patches interest. If anyone could use a Maatta or Dumoulin, it's the Habs right now after trading away Sergachev. Mete is nice but he's really young.
What would Kane be looking for on his next contract? 6M? More than that?
Would JR possibly be looking at Reinhart?
ETA: I mean he quite clearly was willing to move Maatta in a Duchene deal...
If the report of GMJR making one last attempt on Duchene before he was moved is true, it basically tells they offered Maatta and probably Sprong also.
Why not both Kane and Reinhart if possible?
A Kane deal could really help and injecting some youth. We’d have to move our 1st for a D man. Line up below still has a couple what ifs, Sprong at NHL level and Jake at C but we’d have good flexibility
Kane Crosby Sprong
Hagelin Malkin Kessel
Sheary Guentzel Hornqvist
ZAR Sheahan Rust
I’ve missed the past 2 games, how has Guentzel looked at Center?Thats a solid point as well that the LW'er frees up Jake to 3C but i just dunno if thats where JR wants Jake to land. Suppose he could just go with Sheahan(3C), Whatever @ 4C with the better winger depth after the deal.
Anyways, acquiring an upper echelon LW'er certainly gives better overall depth if Olli+futures is the price.
Thats a solid point as well that the LW'er frees up Jake to 3C but i just dunno if thats where JR wants Jake to land. Suppose he could just go with Sheahan(3C), Whatever @ 4C with the better winger depth after the deal.
I’ve missed the past 2 games, how has Guentzel looked at Center?
I’m not moving Maatta for a rental.
I’m not moving Maatta for a rental.
I’m not moving Maatta for a rental.