pensfan71
Registered User
- Jun 9, 2010
- 15,724
- 1,601
Quick go after Brodin and Spurgeon for our junk.
Ahh I knew there was a reason JR backed JJ today
Quick go after Brodin and Spurgeon for our junk.
Quick go after Brodin and Spurgeon for our junk.
FowlerSo who does the board obsess about now for the next few years? Coyle was constantly mentioned here the past 2+.
I’m not sure Fenton knows what he’s doing. I’m not huge on Coyle and I don’t know that much about Donato, but you traded Coyle and Neids for Donato and Rask.
Barf. That's Chiarelli/Milbury level there. That Neids/Rask trade was mega barf. Wild fans should be pissed.
I’m not sure Fenton knows what he’s doing. I’m not huge on Coyle and I don’t know that much about Donato, but you traded Coyle and Neids for Donato and Rask.
Donato might be better than I know, idk. Surface level suggests this isn’t amazing, and yea that last trade is barf.
I desperately want speeeeeeed.
I desperately want speeeeeeed.
If Minny are going to start making real moves, is there any chance they could be convinced to part with one of their blueliners? He's pricey, but Spurgeon?
Edit: Minny like their Finns, too. If Olli wasnt injured I bet he would hold some value for them (he would fit in perfectly, age-wise for a retool/rebuild)
I know this is an ongoing debate, but if Fowler can stay healthy I can't for the life of me see how he could fail on this team. With his skating, even if you take out all his offensive ability, he just seems like a perfect Pens player, down to the ground.
Then again I was dead wrong about Brassard so what do I know?
JR go hard after Surgeon. Moving Pearson would allow us to fit his salary.
If Minny are going to start making real moves, is there any chance they could be convinced to part with one of their blueliners? He's pricey, but Spurgeon?
Edit: Minny like their Finns, too. If Olli wasnt injured I bet he would hold some value for them (he would fit in perfectly, age-wise for a retool/rebuild)
Probably wont happen but would be cool if Ducks ate 1M of Fowlers contract since they will be rebuilding I am assuming and all. Roll our top 4 D as much as possible, JJ can play 5 minutes or less.The difference between Fowler and the role we'd want for him and Brassard and the role we wanted for him couldn't be more different. Fowler would be at worst our #3D and he would be playing big minutes in pretty much every situation (offensively, defensively, PP, PK, etc). That wasn't the situation Brassard was given, or one that he had much interested in attempting to do in a contract year (if at all). IF Fowler was a RD where he'd be battling KL/JS for minutes and chances then I think this would be a little more of a comparable situation, but as a very good LD, he'd basically only be battling Dumoulin for icetime. And when you're that good, there's more than enough icetime to go around between the two of them.