The issues with saying "why didn't we add Pouliot in the offseason?"
1. It pretends Pouliot would have picked the Penguins over the Sabres "just because". It pretends that player role has no factor here. On Buffalo, Pouliot could be a top-6 forward for them because Buffalo sucks on LW. On Pittsburgh, there was a very real possibility for him to be a 4th liner here. He had a worse season last year than Hagelin did.
2. It pretends the Penguins had a need on LW in the first place. The Penguins would have been better off just re-signing Kunitz if they thought they needed another LWer. Instead, they were confident enough in their team at LW that they let Kunitz walk and later traded Wilson for Sheahan.
3. It pretends that people here wouldn't have been mad that JR was wasting over $1 million dollars on a reclamation player he didn't need.
Called hindsight. People that argue or complain based on hindsight aren't arguing from a position of logic or knowledge.
Want the ultimate hindsight discussion? Let's look at current VGK performance vs expansion draft lists from July. You think there's a team or two that would do things different? My god...Flordia and Columbus fans should be on riot or suicide watch. I don't know which.
I cant remember who said it, but there was a report that Bergevin didnt want to deal Galchenyuk to the Pens. He didnt want to deal with criticism from the media and fans. Stuff like, If the defending champs trust/play Galchenyuk at centre then what was the problem in Montreal. Not sure I believe it but worth knowing.
I mean, that's a big part of the "game within the game" for GMs. How do I make my team better without making another team better? I mean, look at the Letang to Toronto trade proposals...why would JR want to send a #1D to Toronto...I team that is currently one of the top teams in the league and a team we may have to play in the playoffs. So I get that some GMs won't trade certain players to certain teams. Why would anyone do us a favor? 2016, all three trades were from the western conference. 2017, it was Hainsey but it's not like that was a big addition at the time. Galchenyuk comes here and turns it around...Bergevin would be crucified, especially if the trade was for magic beans.
I think we are going to have to look at a team that's struggling mightily who may want to relieve themselves on a contract. Ottawa and Brassard or Oilers with RNH are both in that mold.
Does nothing but ***** about Rutherford's summer. Move on, my God.
You got to wonder at what point will the mods consider what any of them are doing as trolling or threadjacking. Hell, could even be spamming at this point. Even though I have several of (((them))) on ignore, I still have to wade through everyone else's replies to them. And it's the same shit over and over and over. I'm sick of it and I'm sure a lot of other people are too.
Was reading the comments on Ryan's latest blog and a couple people there said their friends in Ottawa texted them that the Pens are currently in discussions with OTT to acquire Bobby Ryan and Brassard. Apparently that's the scuttlebutt there.
Obviously that would mean salary would have to go out or be retained. Hags? I'm not a big fan of that deal...two older players with salary. I hope this is not true or doesn't materialize
Brassard for Hagelin+picks I could see happening. I can't even begin to fathom how Ryan fits into the equation. He was good against us in the playoffs but I can't see a fit for him here.
It wouldn't surprise me though if taking on at least part of Ryan's contract was the cost of doing business with OTT, at least for the Pens. They so want to move on from it....
Even at 50% retention...I still can't see a place here. Sheary+Sheahan+Hagelin for Brassard+Ryan (% retained to make caps even)...I mean...I'm not even sure I do that.