brian_griffin
"Eric Cartman?"
Thanks! As a side note: I read somewhere that players pay tax where they play away games. If that’s correct and the difference in state tax isn’t bigger I don’t really get the complaints that the cap should be adjusted according to state tax - especially since most players own pretty expensive property and I’m sure there are a lot of other variables when it comes to taxes.
One more OT question: if you own property in a state where you don’t live, do you pay the property tax in that state?
Yes, pro athletes have accountants who keep track of income and expenses in various states for purposes of filing correct taxes. It applies to ordinary non-athletes too. People who live in Connecticut (a state with no state income tax) but work in New York City, pay New York State income tax, and New York City income tax.
Yes, Americans who own property whether singularly, jointly, or as part of a trust or other arrangement, pays property tax on every parcel. If I have multiple houses or vacant land acreages in multiple states, I would get a tax bill from each of the municipalities in those states. it's the same way with income tax. If I'm a Philadelphia Flyer employee, but live across the river in New Jersey, I would pay income tax on the home Flyer games to the State (actually Pennsylvania is a Commonwealth) of Pennsylvania, but my property tax (for schools, road, fire department, civil services, etc.,) would be paid to the town/village/city/borough I lived in New Jersey.
As a sidebar, it is not clear to me how Native American ("Indian") reservations work, and I'm sure the laws are not universal for that. My understanding is that private property (land, house, business) ownership by native Americans on reservation lands is not universal throughout the United States. In some cases private ownership is possible, in other cases it's not. There are pros and cons to that from both sides, depending on your view. The laws governing native American lands and reservations are complex, and most of it dates back to the 1900s, 1800s, 1700s.
Part of the complexity stems from the US government separation of powers. There is a Bureau of Indian Affairs, which is a branch of the US department of the interior, which is part of the executive branch. However, the presidential authority to make treaties with Indian nations and tribes must be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate within the legislative branch, and since there are literally hundreds of such treaties enacted over the years, they are not necessarily uniform across all states / tribes / parts of the USA.