I'd only trade Schmaltz if we could trade sign Nylander long term and I'd imagine Toronto would want Schmaltz signed long term as well.Schamtlz and Forsling
Nylander is a way better center than Schmaltz and not afraid of physical contact..that alone makes him more valuable to me..put him between Saad and Kane and thats a dynamite lineSchmaltz is as good and it could be argued, better than Nylander...why would Chicago add????
Schamtlz and Forsling
Schmaltz is better defensively, Nylander is still the better player, but it is much closer than you suggest. Schmaltz and Forsling makes no sense for us to do...Nylander is a way better center than Schmaltz and not afraid of physical contact..that alone makes him more valuable to me..put him between Saad and Kane and thats a dynamite line
If you can sign Nylander to a reasonable deal, it's a great trade for the HawksThis would be a terrible trade for the Hawks.
Nylander hasn't even played C. Schmaltz is better defensively by quite a bit, and offensively there isn't much of a gap.Nylander is a way better center than Schmaltz and not afraid of physical contact..that alone makes him more valuable to me..put him between Saad and Kane and thats a dynamite line
Depends how you value Forsling. If you think he's worthless, it's at best a sideways move.If you can sign Nylander to a reasonable deal, it's a great trade for the Hawks
Agree. Hawks now on the other side of cap difficulties. Leaves are in a similar position to previous Hawks years.The idea of this Blackhawks thread is to fleece the Leafs. Not for the Leafs to steal from the Blackhawks. Otherwise, what's the point?
Not worthless. I like Forsling, but his spot on the roster is going to get cannibalised soon.Depends how you value Forsling. If you think he's worthless, it's at best a sideways move.
It just doesn't make sense to make that trade. Nylander has not been a C yet, so can he do it? Schmaltz and Kane have great chemistry, will Nylander and Kane? Schmaltz produces nearly asmmuch as Nylander last year, and better defensively. Highly likely Schmaltz signs for less than Nylander. So what's the point of that trade?Not worthless. I like Forsling, but his spot on the roster is going to get cannibalised soon.
I don't agree with this. Schmaltz is too reliant on Kane, it's very one-sided. Combined with Saad, they look incredibly lazy. The difference is that style works for Kane. Schmaltz isn't Kane but he thinks he is.Schmaltz and Kane have great chemistry
The Hawks would be in a great financial situation without Seabrook's contract. That would give us the ability to sign 2 star FAs next year. With the young defensemen and possibly a healthy Crow ... that would make the Hawks legitimate Cup contenders.Agree. Hawks now on the other side of cap difficulties. Leaves are in a similar position to previous Hawks years.
Not worthless. I like Forsling, but his spot on the roster is going to get cannibalised soon.
Nylander is a way better center than Schmaltz and not afraid of physical contact..that alone makes him more valuable to me..put him between Saad and Kane and thats a dynamite line
They even talk about the chemistry they have. It's dumb to deny it. Yes. Schmaltz doesn't shoot as much as he should, but they know where each other are going to be, and where they are going, and work very well together.I don't agree with this. Schmaltz is too reliant on Kane, it's very one-sided. Combined with Saad, they look incredibly lazy. The difference is that style works for Kane. Schmaltz isn't Kane but he thinks he is.
lol, after I posted I was like errr wait a minute....He's not even a center?
They don't. They make each other look lazier than they are.They even talk about the chemistry they have. It's dumb to deny it. Yes. Schmaltz doesn't shoot as much as he should, but they know where each other are going to be, and where they are going, and work very well together.
I don't agree with this. Schmaltz is too reliant on Kane, it's very one-sided. Combined with Saad, they look incredibly lazy. The difference is that style works for Kane. Schmaltz isn't Kane but he thinks he is.