BIG GIFS
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2004
- 3,421
- 177
Lol, I needed a laugh.yeah Koivu didnt show up every night
Lol, I needed a laugh.yeah Koivu didnt show up every night
Ugh
11 is cursed
Saku " I show up once in a while" Koivu
Gomez
what the... i dont even know...yeah Koivu didnt show up every night
I find it interesting how little we've heard about Gainey on this. It's all about Ray Whitney and Mark Recchi putting Erik Cole over as a needed asset. Stars fans are afraid of the return of the "Boys Club" and I'm not surprised.
I don't want to stir up crap, but that's a jackass move by Ryder, you're the new guy in town, you don't take other player's numbers. It'll be weird seeing the #11 on Gallagher.
Brendan Gallagher, after giving Michael Ryder No. 73: "I heard Rolex makes nice watches."
Habs should do the nice thing and get everyone who bought a #73 Gallagher jersey a new Gallagher #11 jersey for free. Then send the old ones to people in Africa.
Aside from the fact I think number 11 should be retired in Montreal, Gallagher will do the number justice, can't be any worse than the last guy to disgrace it.
Luc Gelinas just said Ryder wants a written apology from HFboards poster "Maxpac"
Number 11 seems like a bit of a weighty number to just give to a rookie...
After spending a day thinking about the trade, here's my take:
- Cole is known for a slow starter. He under-performed again in this early season, but I think he will eventually play better.
- Cole is tougher and hit harder and more than Ryder. While Cole doesn't produce, he may create some chances for other by going to the net, or cause the opponents to take penalty.
- Ryder is unidimensional player. Without scoring, he may be useless.
- People, me included, usually are excited about an arrival of a new player. That fact may affect our trade analysis.
Hence, I conclude that if looking strictly at the on-ice performance, I think that Cole is a better hockey player than Ryder. Therefore, Habs lose slightly on the hockey aspect. In short term, I think Dallas is a better team with Cole, than with Ryder. That may be the reason that Dallas give us a 3rd pick.
However, if considering the draft pick and the contract situation, then Habs win a bit.
In brief, this is a very fair trade as opposed to some people thought.
I agree with you. No one got fleeced. Cole is a better overall player and a leader.
Ryder might sign elsewhere in July. In the meantime, he can hopefully scores some big ones for us.
We gonna have a 3rd rounder that might be useful down the road and some free cap space.
I wonder what # Gally will pick when MB brings Saku back here
After spending a day thinking about the trade, here's my take:
- Cole is known for a slow starter. He under-performed again in this early season, but I think he will eventually play better.
- Cole is tougher and hit harder and more than Ryder. While Cole doesn't produce, he may create some chances for other by going to the net, or cause the opponents to take penalty.
- Ryder is unidimensional player. Without scoring, he may be useless.
- People, me included, usually are excited about an arrival of a new player. That fact may affect our trade analysis.
Hence, I conclude that if looking strictly at the on-ice performance, I think that Cole is a better hockey player than Ryder. Therefore, Habs lose slightly on the hockey aspect. In short term, I think Dallas is a better team with Cole, than with Ryder. That may be the reason that Dallas give us a 3rd pick.
However, if considering the draft pick and the contract situation, then Habs win a bit.
In brief, this is a very fair trade as opposed to some people thought.
I don't get the rolex joke...
He's implying that he want to receive money from Ryder for that move.