Hoghandler
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2019
- 1,921
- 930
You can't be serious?I would assume it would probably be some combination of 2020 1st, Wahlstrom, Holmstrom, Sorokin
You can't be serious?
Minnesota doesn't need a winger as the main piece back. They need someone like Horvat.To Min- Brock Boeser, Adam Gaudette
To Van- Jonas Brodin, Luke Kunin
Minnesota doesn't need a winger as the main piece back. They need someone like Horvat.
To Min- Brock Boeser, Adam Gaudette
To Van- Jonas Brodin, Luke Kunin
You don’t have any reason to be in this thread. All you’ve done is try to stir the pot. If you came here trying to make a trade, that’s one thing, but all you’ve done is take a shot at our fan base. Just grow up bud
You don't think it's a little disingenuous to use 22 points in 32 games last year as part of his "baseline"?
You’re right...have your pick of anyone on the team for Dumba. I’m serious
True, but getting a young, local, 1st line winger is a pretty damn sweet asset for a team looking to re-build. Could do a lot worse than Boeser in a Brodin deal. Brock is also a tremendous person and highly marketable off the ice.
Adam Gaudette has played at centre all season and is on pace for 44 points, in 13:00 of ice time. At 23, could potentially be a 2C if he reaches his potential.
Guerin can also move wingers for help elsewhere in separate deals. If Boeser is the best asset on the table, would be tough to not take it...
Probably 60+ points AND he can find Buck Hill without using GPS.Yeah hook me up with a 55 point winger, that's what we need
If Boeser is the best asset on the table, would be tough to not take it...
Probably 60+ points AND he can find Buck Hill without using GPS.
Hope you are being sarcastic or maybe it’s the sarsaparilla talking.I would assume it would probably be some combination of 2020 1st, Wahlstrom, Holmstrom, Sorokin
Lol, keep hitting the bottle. Top prospects and a first to pay off Fletcher's mistake for five years? As bad as Ladd's contract is, it's cheaper and shorter, Parise's is a f***in anchor.I would assume it would probably be some combination of 2020 1st, Wahlstrom, Holmstrom, Sorokin
Hope you are being sarcastic or maybe it’s the sarsaparilla talking.
Lol, keep hitting the bottle. Top prospects and a first to pay off Fletcher's mistake for five years? As bad as Ladd's contract is, it's cheaper and shorter, Parise's is a f*ckin anchor.
I would assume it would probably be some combination of 2020 1st, Wahlstrom, Holmstrom, Sorokin
No thanks, we need no wingers, especially injury prone ones.To Min- Brock Boeser, Adam Gaudette
To Van- Jonas Brodin, Luke Kunin
Yes cause there is no doubt a long line of bidders lining up for a declining 35 yr old Parise and his remaining 5+ yrs/$7.5 per
A person that says Parise is an anchor while also describing Ladd’s contract as just bad look pretty ridiculous to me. One of those guys has over 20 goals in the NHL. The other has just barely over 10 in the AHL.
[mod]
There's at least one.
Russo's been pretty adamant that the recapture penalties would not be a factor in the decision making on Parise, which seems weird. If they did move him with full retention, does anyone know if the retained salary counts toward lowering the recapture penalty between now and the end of his contract?
I agree that the Wild would not get back anything worth writing home about. They'd be moving him to free up the roster spot for a younger player.