So they're not sending the Memorial Cup champion then? That's a shame.
See you in Sochi.
I doubt the NHL will participate in Sochi.
Yes, it's exaclty what it is. A gimmick organized by a bunch of europeans for europeans in favour of seeing a european team winning as is everything that's organized by the IIHF. That's all it is. It's not even worthy of the title championship, or hockey. It's the game we made turned into some ****ing pansy show with mandatory visor's, death penalties for fighting, and diving princesses, and it's played on a ****ing soccer field so the russians, the czech's, swede's and every other european team can avoid one of the most important aspect's of the game in physical play. It's a ********* tournament, and I wish to **** canada, and the US for that matter would just leave it to europe to play *****puck amongst themselves, and wait for the real championship every four years, so that they can take each other on in the gold medal game. ****, what a ****ing joke!
Hmm. That sounds pretty cool. Oldschool. Canada used to send our best club team to the olympics years ago, before we had a "national team".
only thing that matters.
If NHL doesnt take part in sochi i hope they go into another lockout, KHL gets all players and NHL is doomed for ever as the best league in the world. How can world's best league even think to not take part of olympics. Thats really, really sad from them.
wow NHL season >>>>>>>>>>>> Olympics. it's sad how none of you overseas understand that most of us would rather have 9 months of NHL over 1 month of Olympics. it's not even close
Cant be that hard in every 4 years to have olympic break in that league. What the heck is the problem there, its olympics, its biggest thing that there is and will ever be in sports
vezna said:except it isn't? stanley cup > olympic gold. every NHL player i've seen asked this question would always rather win the cup
except it isn't? stanley cup > olympic gold. every NHL player i've seen asked this question would always rather win the cup
who is saying they couldn't win both the cup and olympics? What the heck is the problem, i dont see the idea behind not taking part in olympics.
Because that Olympic break might have a huge negative effect on your chances to win the Stanley Cup. Teams that don't have to send their players (or don't have to send a lot of players) to the Olympic games benefit at the expense of those that do.
I doubt the NHL will participate in Sochi.
And that is the reason they are thinking of bailing out of olympics? Wow. Thats what is called "american arrogance". And im NOT calling everyone there arrogant now.
It's got nothing to do with "American arrogance". NHL is a business. If your team sucks from one year to another the fans who pay your bills stop attending (unless your teams happens to be located either in Montreal or Toronto, in which case you can afford to suck for all eternity and not lose a single paying customer).
Edit: This isn't to say the league should not send players to the Olympics. However, that some people don't want to understand the harsh financial reality is what I'd call "European arrogance".
Good on Russia.
I personally preferred the Olympics when it was amateur/college players. Made it much more exciting to me. I get to watch the NHL guys all the time, and they are already basking in their moment of glory and success. Give the amateurs a shot; Olympics isn't meant to be a contest of millionaires.