There's plenty of evidence of the program itself(documents, emails, the huge number of Russian athletes getting caught in re-tests etc.), not so concrete necessarily on individual athletes.
This isn't a criminal case. There is no court.
And for the record, I agree the IOC shouldn't have banned athletes if they didn't have enough evidence. Doing otherwise just earns them trouble.
Plenty of evidence?LOL How long will you stick to mumblings of a mental guy as evidence?
And again, what about other athletes "getting caught"? Evidence for the US, UK and Canada state doping program? It is according to you. As much as letting them all off the hook is evidence for a corrupt game by WADA and IOC. Why do they let dirty athletes from other countries take their drugs and participate? Are they bribed by the particular states? And thus those states have a state system of bribing WADA officials I assume then by that logic.
The "C" in CAS is for court.
And the criminal case I mean is the organized and planned campaign to corrupt the structures of the olympic movement by several countries. The persons involved should apper in court and answer for their actions. This is very much a criminal case about corruption and state backed attempt on several international organizations in order to illegaly gain control over their structure and actions.
The "trouble" they will earn will be far greatercthan you can imagine. Crossing lines does that.