Obviously your look at bad attitude is different than what I am saying. He's got a bad attitude because of how he played and wanted to be the key player. He was always about himself and not the team. He didn't have the mentors that NJ had to teach him the proper way of playing the game, leading him to a Hart Trophy. He has learned a lot more in NJ than he ever could in Edmonton. That being said, trying to label him like he'd be the same player here as he is in NJ is absurd. The chemistry didn't work with him and McDavid and we know he wants to be the driver, not the passenger. So don't know why it's that difficult to understand.
Wanting to be a key player is a bad attitude? He plays the same way now that he does in New Jersey. The difference is that the organization employs
smart hockey people that actually said what needed to be said to him, given how rough the first 7 years of Hall's career were from a team success standpoint. It needed to be said because nobody in the Oilers organization had ever even tried to do anything like that - there was no such communication to Hall from management, and there was no competent roster building. If the roster had been built properly, nothing would have needed to be said to Hall, because he'd be a great player on a great team, rather than a great player on a shitty team. Hall and McDavid could've co-existed on separate forward lines. Hall wants to win hockey games more than he wants to be the team's scoring leader. Even if he never scored 90+ points here (he probably wouldn't, for the simple fact that the offensive load would be split between him and McDavid, instead of him having to do everything), I have no doubt that he could give us 70-80 points consistently, and solidify an actual, legitimate 2nd line.
Don't know why
this is difficult to understand.