Speculation: Rumour, Trade, and Free Agent Speculation 2018-19 - Part XI

Status
Not open for further replies.

Trinity

Registered User
Dec 12, 2017
3,244
2,022
How's this trade?

Jets get: Patrick, Ghost, 11OA
Philly gets: Trouba, Ehlers, Philly's 5th rounder back

Still not enough for the Jets?
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
49,015
70,047
Winnipeg
I should say last year. I think the previous years he was producing at a top line rate. He falls off a cliff in the playoffs to much for my liking. I doubt they trade him though it would have to be something they couldn't say no too

Well the whole team struggled at ES last year so he wasn't alone there.

Sure his production is going to have to improve in the playoffs. I would be more concerned if his underlying rates weren't still elite. The law of averages would indicate that the points will come if he's still driving chances and shots the way he currently is in the post season.
 

Joe Hallenback

Moderator
Mar 4, 2005
15,392
21,587
Well the whole team struggled at ES last year so he wasn't alone there.

Sure his production is going to have to improve in the playoffs. I would be more concerned if his underlying rates weren't still elite. The law of averages would indicate that the points will come if he's still driving chances and shots the way he currently is in the post season.

So I had some good talks with scouts about Ehlers. They echo everything you say but they wonder if what he would bring back would be more valuable to you as a team then what he can give you. Brought up Jonathan Drouin and his numbers and what he could do and if he was worth more than what they got back, they got back an eltie level Defenseman that is cost controlled which is super important for them going forward.

I would be all for trading Ehlers or Connor if we got something like that in return. I think it is kind of what you have to be thinking in the cap world.

So lets say the trade is Sanheim and 11th overall for Ehlers. I doubt I say no.
 

Howard Chuck

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2012
15,427
19,673
Winnipeg
I should say last year. I think the previous years he was producing at a top line rate. He falls off a cliff in the playoffs to much for my liking. I doubt they trade him though it would have to be something they couldn't say no too

I think last year is a problem for most of the team, when we are trying to place a value on each of them. The two previous years would cause us to value most of our high end talent, much higher.

I think we should throw last year's individual stats out the window, as I don't think they are reliably indicative of what each of the players are in the long term.
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
49,015
70,047
Winnipeg
So I had some good talks with scouts about Ehlers. They echo everything you say but they wonder if what he would bring back would be more valuable to you as a team then what he can give you. Brought up Jonathan Drouin and his numbers and what he could do and if he was worth more than what they got back, they got back an eltie level Defenseman that is cost controlled which is super important for them going forward.

I would be all for trading Ehlers or Connor if we got something like that in return. I think it is kind of what you have to be thinking in the cap world.

So lets say the trade is Sanheim and 11th overall for Ehlers. I doubt I say no.

I doubt I say no either but that is only because we are short on impact d in our cores age range.

Moving Ehlers is going to hurt our ability to gain clean zone entries up front though and that is problematic given all the data that shows more goals are scored based on clean entries. Although a change in philosophy by Maurice might mitigate the loss if more emphasis is put on carrying in vs dumping. No reason why all of Connor, Roslovic, Wheeler, Scheifele and Ves can't gain the zone with control. All have the speed, skill and vision to do it.
 

Howard Chuck

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2012
15,427
19,673
Winnipeg
October - January: 26.4%, 4th
February-April: 22.0%, 8th

I don't know if "neutralize" is the right word here... :sarcasm:

Is this PP in general or just PP1. I think that PP2 bailed us out a few times. I usually think of PP1 when I'm thinking of the issues. PP2 is usually more creative and quick.

It would be awesome to combine the two best qualities.
 

Joe Hallenback

Moderator
Mar 4, 2005
15,392
21,587
I doubt I say no either but that is only because we are short on impact d in our cores age range.

Moving Ehlers is going to hurt our ability to gain clean zone entries up front though and that is problematic given all the data that shows more goals are scored based on clean entries. Although a change in philosophy by Maurice might mitigate the loss if more emphasis is put on carrying in vs dumping. No reason why all of Connor, Roslovic, Wheeler, Scheifele and Ves can't gain the zone with control. All have the speed, skill and vision to do it.

I think that is what they have to be looking at but it would have to be the right deal that comes along. I think teams want Ehlers because of all the reasons you stated before. He is a driver and he can be real effective in the regular season. A team like Philly wants a guy like that. They have to be willing to give us something that we really need back though to make a trade.
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
49,015
70,047
Winnipeg
Is this PP in general or just PP1. I think that PP2 bailed us out a few times. I usually think of PP1 when I'm thinking of the issues. PP2 is usually more creative and quick.

It would be awesome to combine the two best qualities.

Pp 2 is more creative but they don't have the players line up properly to really take advantage. They don't open up any one timers as all our players are on their strong sides and not off sides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigFan10

Howard Chuck

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2012
15,427
19,673
Winnipeg
Pp 2 is more creative but they don't have the players line up properly to really take advantage. They don't open up any one timers as all our players are on their strong sides and not off sides.

But their creativity on the fly and lack of 'lining up' created lots of chances for them. That's why I would like a combination of PP1's talent and PP2's ability to be creative in the context of what the opposing PK is giving them.
 

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,241
12,960
I doubt I say no either but that is only because we are short on impact d in our cores age range.

Moving Ehlers is going to hurt our ability to gain clean zone entries up front though and that is problematic given all the data that shows more goals are scored based on clean entries. Although a change in philosophy by Maurice might mitigate the loss if more emphasis is put on carrying in vs dumping. No reason why all of Connor, Roslovic, Wheeler, Scheifele and Ves can't gain the zone with control. All have the speed, skill and vision to do it.

The dumping isn't on Maurice unless you heard him say he prefers that game - I've never heard that.
More likely we dumped due to lack of options after being pinned in our own end for the majority of the shift based on a lack of effort / defensive drive in our own end.
And we know that Maurice didn't suggest less effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jets 31

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
49,015
70,047
Winnipeg
But their creativity on the fly and lack of 'lining up' created lots of chances for them. That's why I would like a combination of PP1's talent and PP2's ability to be creative in the context of what the opposing PK is giving them.

I think you can keep the creativity while opening up shots more. Ideally you might be able to create a Tampa type set up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Chuck

Trinity

Registered User
Dec 12, 2017
3,244
2,022
This could impact Trouba trade talks:

Sounds like Kevin Hayes was impressed by his visit with #Flyers. Money talks, so we’ll see, but they have work to do to entice him not to go to market. My understanding is PHI isn’t No. 1 on his list at the moment. That can change. I believe he’d be intrigued by #CBJ and #Coyotes
 

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,075
33,132
I think you can keep the creativity while opening up shots more. Ideally you might be able to create a Tampa type set up.
I've been surprised that they have never interchanged Wheeler and Connor on the right side after it goes to the point. That would give them a couple of one-timer shooting options from a pass from the point, and perhaps open up a bit more space with Connor as a scoring threat. Wheeler is basically a one-trick pony from that spot. He is only dangerous as a passer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: surixon

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
22,273
27,068
This could impact Trouba trade talks:

Sounds like Kevin Hayes was impressed by his visit with #Flyers. Money talks, so we’ll see, but they have work to do to entice him not to go to market. My understanding is PHI isn’t No. 1 on his list at the moment. That can change. I believe he’d be intrigued by #CBJ and #Coyotes
if i were him, unless i am enamored with playing under AV again, id hit July 1. Asides from Duchene he's the only notable top 6 calibre C, he's gonna get paid
 

Gm0ney

Unicorns salient
Oct 12, 2011
14,579
13,251
Winnipeg
Is this PP in general or just PP1. I think that PP2 bailed us out a few times. I usually think of PP1 when I'm thinking of the issues. PP2 is usually more creative and quick.

It would be awesome to combine the two best qualities.
That was overall PP%. PP1 did take a hit when Buff was injured. The big point shot (or threat of it) is an important part of the Jets first unit powerplay. Buff's a pretty good passer and decision maker too. When Trouba subbed in, the unit did well at first but I think what teams keyed in on was that the point threat wasn't the same without Buff and that allowed them to shut down the Wheeler-Laine connection.

Still, the Jets have been running the same powerplay for ages and it remains very effective. Teams know what's coming but there's not a whole lot they can do about it. If Laine's dialed in and he gets the puck in the right spot, it's going in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad