ffh
Registered User
- Jul 16, 2016
- 8,392
- 5,124
what are you talking about. being a good gm isn't about taking risk its about not doing anything risky when you don't have to. like Chiarelli. there is no need to trade ehlers or connor or laine for a long time. for obvious reason. there is nothing to decide here we aint trading for a signed stone cause chevy isn't that stupid.How is that not saying anything about trading Laine?
Some risks have to be taken. Being an NHL GM is about taking risks every day. You want to wait until they have all played another 5 years and then trade the least of them. If that weakest one under-performs you don't get anything back. Meanwhile you have used up the primes of all of your best players with an unbalanced team that can't win.
Some people seem to have the idea that you only trade players you don't like. If you don't like them, no one else will either. If you want something you have to be prepared to pay. I'm sure you know that.
So take a carefully planned risk. Go and get what you need. Expect to have to pay for it.