Honestly not sure what to make out of it. On the surface that is a good value contract for that production, but I honestly don't know what kind player he's going to be. Had so many injury issues in his career.Marcus Johansson just signed for two years at $2M per. He put up 19 goals and 46 points in 80 games split between Washington and Minnesota.
McLeod might cost a bit, but Kostin won't.Kulak and Foegele OUT
Nemo+ Holloway IN
Would be a downgrade for sure but will save us good chunk of cap to extend Kostin/McLeod etc
Kostin will probably be near league minimum for 1 year and Mcleod will be around 1.2 for 2 years is my guess.McLeod might cost a bit, but Kostin won't.
Plus that's too big of down grade to manage on the blueline, unless we're turning Ceci into Ekblad or something.
If Niemo is any higher than 8th on our depth chart we have problems.Kulak and Foegele OUT
Nemo+ Holloway IN
Would be a downgrade for sure but will save us good chunk of cap to extend Kostin/McLeod etc
I am hoping that it could help with someone like Bjugstad.Honestly not sure what to make out of it. On the surface that is a good value contract for that production, but I honestly don't know what kind player he's going to be. Had so many injury issues in his career.
Although Minny really needs some value contracts and it's not that crippling.
It would be bumping Broberg to #6 and Nemo to #7McLeod might cost a bit, but Kostin won't.
Plus that's too big of down grade to manage on the blueline, unless we're turning Ceci into Ekblad or something.
Going from Kulak to Broberg wouldn't be as significant as you think. You're 'downgrading' the bottom pair for the first 40 to 50 games of the regular season. Closer to the deadline you decide if it's necessary to insulate that bottom pair.McLeod might cost a bit, but Kostin won't.
Plus that's too big of down grade to manage on the blueline, unless we're turning Ceci into Ekblad or something.
I have Nemo behind both Broberg and Dineen.If Niemo is any higher than 8th on our depth chart we have problems.
I don't see the Rangers giving him up for anything other than an overpay.The Oilers should target Alexis Lafrenière in a trade this offseason. His point totals are way down and his value is extremely low likely.
However, his underlying stats are pretty nice actually and he could be a decent depth option, plus still has a bit of upside left. Could be a Beniot Pouliot type of pick up
There's no way they sign for that little. I'm seeing something like $3m total between the two of them depending on term.Kostin will probably be near league minimum for 1 year and Mcleod will be around 1.2 for 2 years is my guess.
Oof, that's rough. Though I wonder if you could buy low on him and maybe a different situation might help him.
Fair, but he also had horrendous playoffs. And the other kids are starting to put up numbers as well. Either way, something to look into if they're going to move on.Significant difference is that Yakupov's PPG was heavily influenced by that first season where he saw a ton of top line opportunity and a heavy focus on production offensively.
Lafreniere has been on the 'kid line' for the better part of three seasons there.
I don't see Lafreniere as a bust. I see him as a player who is learning to play an honest game. Kakko, too. You probably won't see elite numbers from either of them, so it's not a good look for guys that went 1, 2 in the draft. But for the Rangers it keeps them cheap and gives them a good stretch to develop chemistry.
There's no benefit to the Rangers dealing any of their young players unless it's an overpay.
Montreal would be a ready built landing spot if the Oilers wanted to go that way.I'd be open to taking a shot on Laf, the problem is the ask will probably be a premium for us because they don't want to deal him here only to watch him explode with McDavid or Draisaitl and then the narrative becomes "why'd the Rangers give up on this kid?". I mean maybe that's not the case, but I have to think it's kind of in the back of the GM's mind.
I guess the other issue is if he does take off here, not sure how our cap structure would allow us to retain him, but I suppose in that case you could move him elsewhere and get a bigger return than what you gave up.
Kostin has no arbitration rights and is our 12th forward. Mcleod is a young 4th line center. I'd be shocked if they get over 2.5 million combined.There's no way they sign for that little. I'm seeing something like $3m total between the two of them depending on term.
I think the reality is that the Oilers can't bring back the same team even if they move one of the $3m contracts, some prospects are going to have to fill the vacated roles. That's just life in a flat cap world and when you're paying a player like Campbell $5m/yr.
Laf is another 30 point season away from being traded for a 3rd and ECHL contract player. Our left side is already full. We need some right shot players for next season.I don't see the Rangers giving him up for anything other than an overpay.
The guy is still an NHLer and his contract shouldn't be very high. Contender still need cheap depth guys and I don't really see why you trade a 40 point 21 year old that still has room to develop.
He could very well be, but the risk is just too large to dump him for anything more than an overpay right now. They are in win now mode and unless they are getting good assets to win now for him, there is zero reason to deal him.Kostin has no arbitration rights and is our 12th forward. Mcleod is a young 4th line center. I'd be shocked if they get over 2.5 million combined.
Laf is another 30 point season away from being traded for a 3rd and ECHL contract player. Our left side is already full. We need some right shot players for next season.
Neither player has any leverage. Kostin in particular. It would shock me if he did not agree to sign for $1M or less. McLeod's injury cost him a chance at a bigger raise. With relatively similar production Yamamoto got $1.175M. I think McLeod is looking at $1.2-1.4M.There's no way they sign for that little. I'm seeing something like $3m total between the two of them depending on term.
I think the reality is that the Oilers can't bring back the same team even if they move one of the $3m contracts, some prospects are going to have to fill the vacated roles. That's just life in a flat cap world and when you're paying a player like Campbell $5m/yr.
I always assumed a long term contract for McLeod, but I bet he's on a bridge as well, one he'll likely to outperform, same as Bouchard.Neither player has any leverage. Kostin in particular. It would shock me if he did not agree to sign for $1M or less. McLeod's injury cost him a chance at a bigger raise. With relatively similar production Yamamoto got $1.175M. I think McLeod is looking at $1.2-1.4M.
It happens. I still see him playing a low event game that doesn't hurt the team. His production has slowly improved year to year and he's been given more responsibility as time has progressed.Fair, but he also had horrendous playoffs. And the other kids are starting to put up numbers as well. Either way, something to look into if they're going to move on.
Doubtful.Laf is another 30 point season away from being traded for a 3rd and ECHL contract player. Our left side is already full. We need some right shot players for next season.
I don't know that I blame the league as much as I would the Rangers. Didn't feel the need to send him back to junior after seeing him struggle?It happens. I still see him playing a low event game that doesn't hurt the team. His production has slowly improved year to year and he's been given more responsibility as time has progressed.
If they're looking strictly at offensive production in that series, I think that they'd be far more concerned with their top forwards who were invisible for the most part.
Doubtful.
If anything, Lafreniere is an example of why the NHL probably shouldn't have messed with the lottery system to begin with. He went to a team that was already improving year over year and they were in a position to make the playoffs that year.
The top pick should go to the bad teams. It gives them the best opportunity to be an primary player, produce immediate offense and earn the most money. That didn't happen there.
I don't think the Rangers are terribly disappointed with how either of Kakko or Lafreniere have developed to this point. If either had hit elite status, odds are they'd have to move on from an impact player or two.
Tough to say. The Owen Power thing probably had more to do with COVID and the idea that he may not have felt that he got a true college experience.I don't know that I blame the league as much as I would the Rangers. Didn't feel the need to send him back to junior after seeing him struggle?
This whole stigma about how if you send a top pick back to Junior or wherever that they aren't good needs to really end. Do teams not look at what happened with Leon and think geez if a 4 time one point player can go back why can't our guy?
Thankfully Owen Power took that decision out of the Sabres hands last year.
Kostin will value a one way contract.I always assumed a long term contract for McLeod, but I bet he's on a bridge as well, one he'll likely to outperform, same as Bouchard.
And I still think Kostin will sign for 2yrs at between $875 & 950K per. If he has more good seasons, he'll get paid after that.