sportsfan944804 said:
Have you looked at this proposal? Keep in mind, for us to rid ourselves of Russell's salary to any team, would cost us similarly what it cost Toronto to unload Marleau (a 1st round pick).
I know that us fans enjoy coming up with ludicrous trade proposals to feel good, and dream or whatever, and this is especially done towards other fanbases who don't have enough fans to defend themselves...but good lord man. You really think we are going to get OEL for Samorukov? AND they're going to retain 1.5 mil? What clown world are you operating in? Or which clown world is Kurt Leavins operating in?
Obvious click bait for poor Oilers fans waiting around for something to happen. Grasping at any morsel of information or hope that we will finally acquire the fabled #1 defenceman missing since 2006. Well, imagine all we had to do this whole time was trade some random prospect who will be lucky to crack an NHL roster and a cap dump? LOL? For a #1 defenceman.
Yea, you guys really need to reconsider what is going on here. If OEL does get traded, it is for a package involving one of our young roster defenceman (Nurse/Bear/Jones), at least a 1st round pick...and if we want to rid ourselves of Russell, we are adding more. Puljujarvi perhaps.
I swear, sometimes I read through these threads and am basically praying that half of you are trolling at this point.
The proposal's not really mine, Stauffer has been hinting at that general outline for weeks and Leavins brought up the fact retention would be on the table.
First thing pre and post covid world are entirely different so many teams hemorrhaged boat loads of cash with the NHL being a gate driven business and that is aside from some of the owners losing a lot of money in their business ventures outside of hockey which is more a hobby for the rich than a business venture. When your core businesses lose money you tend to want to get more frugal with regards to your pet hobbies.
In 2019-20 with Marleau, the potential avenues for unloading Marleau's $6.25M cap-hit were very minimal, it's a completely different landscape in next years market, also Marleau had an NMC and only accepted the trade so he could be bought out and go back to SJ. In this upcoming season the number of teams who have zero intention of going right up to the cap will increase pretty dramatically, with a higher focus on real dollars versus cap dollars, the $1.5M Russell is owed for what he contributes is a paltry sum in todays market he should absolutely carry positive value.
Next IMO OEL has zero value whatsoever at his full cap-hit given the seasons he's had of recent, he has not been playing at all like a #1 d-man, you'd have to be an idiot to jump at taking on his $8.25M with 7 years remaining deal (5th highest paid d-man in the league), it's only through retention that he starts to have value. On top of that OEL can restrict the teams options for where they can trade him with his NMC and the looming $54M owed to him for a cash starved team makes the prospect of moving him seem likely and almost forced. When you shrink the number of potential suitors through an NMC and through the sheer amount of money owed to OEL so poor/frugal owners have issues even engaging in the discussions it should lead to a stronger trading position for us.
It seems from what's been hinted out there Russell and a 1st would be going for OEL (/w retention) the sticking points are likely how much retention and what D prospect, the D prospect involved and the amount of retention are what fans are guessing at (also need to make sure Russell's NTC doesn't conflict or have Russell agree to waive it).