Fuuuuuuck that. I have zero confidence in Sakic. I'll admit I was a Bednar hater, we had a 48 point season but I was allowed to be. I dunno if he's a great coach but he's not exactly the rate-limiting step. The guy is holding the Sharks to low scores with our problematic roster. Sakic has done very little for him in terms of acquiring depth and Sakic has had SIX YEARS.
People here are complaining about the deployment of Kerfoot or Andrighetto or whomever but every coach in this league has problematic deployment of players and Bednar's is not bad in comparison. The way to solve it is to have good depth and as long as you lack any actual top six players outside the big three, you're gonna have a bad time with a Kerfoot or someone. Look at Sakic's best players......
MacKinnon - Acquired from the scouting dep't
Landeskog - Pre-Sakic acquisition from scouting
Rantanen - Scouting acquisition
Makar - Scouting acquisition
Grubauer - Credit to Sakic he needed a goalie and got one
Girard - A prospect included in a trade, I'll credit both Sakic & the scouting department
Barrie & Johnson - Pre-Sakic and one of them should've been moved by Sakic
You bring up some valid points and some are, imo, a case of hindsight is 20/20, but I want to touch on the bolded: GM's are always heavily included in the decision of top ten picks, most in the whole 1st round, while by far the most let the scouting department do their thing from round 2 and onwards (Dorion would probably be an example of a GM involved all the way). This fact is also why I chuckle a bit when people rave on Yzerman for being such a good drafting GM.
There are usually reports of Sakic being at games/tournaments watching possible picks in the high 1st round, so Sakic should also get credit for the bolded.