Which is why part of me thinks Landy may make more sense as the #2C than some of the ideas that get thrown out. He'd need another forward who can drive offense with him though.
This is how I assume they’ll bring along the 2C they take at 4OA.
Which is why part of me thinks Landy may make more sense as the #2C than some of the ideas that get thrown out. He'd need another forward who can drive offense with him though.
This is how I assume they’ll bring along the 2C they take at 4OA.
Read my mind lol. You don't even need that sarcasm emoji IMO.
I used the sarcasm emoji, because I’ll be stunned if Panarin winds up signing with Colorado. But, he certainly fits your offensive line driver pairing for Landy in that hypothetical.
Which is why part of me thinks Landy may make more sense as the #2C than some of the ideas that get thrown out. He'd need another forward who can drive offense with him though.
Well someone has something coming that is much worse than surprise lol. I don't think I've ever wanted Dater to be right about something this bad in 20+ years.
I used the sarcasm emoji, because I’ll be stunned if Panarin winds up signing with Colorado. But, he certainly fits your offensive line driver pairing for Landy in that hypothetical.
Well the problem is that Panarin likes the Ocean. He likes to live next to the ocean. Some people just like that setting. They want to live next to the ocean.
Do you think that's a plausible scenario? Like, say they went out and picked up another allstar winger and they wanted to roll two lines: Landy could serve as a legitimate #2C in the nhl? I'm not doubting the notion, just curious, hadn't really ever considered it.Which is why part of me thinks Landy may make more sense as the #2C than some of the ideas that get thrown out. He'd need another forward who can drive offense with him though.
I used the sarcasm emoji, because I’ll be stunned if Panarin winds up signing with Colorado. But, he certainly fits your offensive line driver pairing for Landy in that hypothetical.
No one believes in us it seems.
One of Landy's best contributions is from the wing on the breakout. He sets up along the wall, slows the pace down, draws the opposition to him, and hits Nate with a pass in stride. Another is his ability to drive through checks along the wall to gain the O zone and maintain possession.
If he's playing center for Bednar, he's going to be the guy driving up the middle on the breakout, not the wall. I think this leads him to overhanding the puck, and skating into trouble areas because he can't use his strength as much. He has to use speed and stick handling more up the middle, which aren't his best attributes, though he's competent at both. Unless he's just playing a dump and chase style game, which is unlikely under Bednar.
Every time they separate him from Nate too, Nate is worse, and by extent the team is worse. He also helps Nate win face-offs, which isn't really a strength of his. IMO he should stay on the wing throughout his career. That's likely where he's best.
I still think Rantanen could learn. He certainly is good at dishing the puck and is a better puck carrier than landeskog. Not that Landy is bad at it.Which is why part of me thinks Landy may make more sense as the #2C than some of the ideas that get thrown out. He'd need another forward who can drive offense with him though.
No one believes in us it seems.
I dunno who made these odds, but the Avs have a large advantage now
Well we split on the road, and come home with the last change. We will get better match ups, and the home crowd is amazing.?
More like we pulled ourselves back onto level ground.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs, Historical Data | Hockey-Reference.com
79 teams have won after splitting the first two games on the road while 83 have lost.
(I'm normally okay with saying, we, instead of, the Avs, but ourselves feels very wrong)
One of Landy's best contributions is from the wing on the breakout. He sets up along the wall, slows the pace down, draws the opposition to him, and hits Nate with a pass in stride. Another is his ability to drive through checks along the wall to gain the O zone and maintain possession.
If he's playing center for Bednar, he's going to be the guy driving up the middle on the breakout, not the wall. I think this leads him to overhanding the puck, and skating into trouble areas because he can't use his strength as much. He has to use speed and stick handling more up the middle, which aren't his best attributes, though he's competent at both. Unless he's just playing a dump and chase style game, which is unlikely under Bednar.
Every time they separate him from Nate too, Nate is worse, and by extent the team is worse. He also helps Nate win face-offs, which isn't really a strength of his. IMO he should stay on the wing throughout his career. That's likely where he's best.
Do you think that's a plausible scenario? Like, say they went out and picked up another allstar winger and they wanted to roll two lines: Landy could serve as a legitimate #2C in the nhl? I'm not doubting the notion, just curious, hadn't really ever considered it.
Hench says Landy has more responsibilities than mack, but I'm wondering if it's not due in part, at least partially, to the synergy they have together? Mack covering for his deficiencies etc (and the more I think about it, I wonder if goes the other way too: Landy covering mack on D allows him to push the play up ice more)
I prefer the Avs remain the underdog. I remember getting nervous when Barry Melrose picked the Avs to win out the West in 2001 and they struggled a bit in that 2nd round series against that ragtag Kings team, then he picked the Devils to win in the Final.