We certainly were not forced into doing exactly what we did, and it's not as if we would have been far worse over the last three years by easing Eichel in a little slower.
I will always reject arguments that suggest there was nothing else to be done - they pop up from the ROR trade to the usage of any single player. The Sabres were not destined to do exactly and only what they did.
You're arguing against something I never put forth. Maybe someone else did but it wasn't me. I said we didn't have the same options usage-wise as the Leafs. Not that we had to do exactly what we had done.
Sure, maybe Larsson has to go from facing hard opponents defensively to facing...a few more hard opponents defensively a little more often, but I'm absolutely not convinced that chasing around Crosby with Eichel by season 2 the way we did was required and that the team would have somehow fallen apart and been unable to score otherwise (because that's literally what has happened Eichel's whole career here anyway...) For example, it's not as if Eich's rookie year lit ES scoring on fire. A replacement in that role, even from the mediocre roster we had, could have combined with the bump Jack would get with easier usage to produce the same, with the net result being a Jack more ready to play real hockey against the big boys later on, than still getting shelled as a bottom 10% of the league player defensively supposedly according to articles I haven't paid to subscribe to.
What you're not understanding is Jack
was the role the last 3 years. No matter who he centered that was going to be our #1 offensive line and the focus of the opposition. Thats a problem created by lacking enough talent not of usage. There was no practical way to "shelter him" or "ease him in" without a viable 2nd offensive line alternative. Because we had no other offensive line option, teams could go after Jack any way they wanted to. They could use their top defensive guys or go best on best or a combo of the both. They had nothing to worry about from another scoring line making them pay.
Trying to "switch" Jack with another center would change nothing. You're arguing a theoretical fantasy where we just put any other center (Larsson or Girgs) between whoever Jack was centering and the other team keeps focusing on that line. They're not going to because the danger of the line and why they were focusing on it was Jack. Once he moves from that line so does the opposition.
The biggest difference between the Leafs in Mathews rookie year and the Sabres in Jack's rookie year and beyond is the talent up front. Its not usage. The Leafs were able to roll out two equally deadly scoring lines and a very good counter punching matchup line. To state the obvious we haven't had the talent to do that the last 3 years. I know you remember the last 3 years of utterly inept bottom 6 offensive play. None of this means we had to do exactly what we did btw. I just means trying what the Leafs did was not possible.
Nowhere did I argue that the Sabres would have had the success of the Leaves if they had just done this, like the implication seems to be bubbling under the surface of this post.
Nowhere did I argue otherwise. You've attributed a few opinions to me in this post that I don't have.
I absolutely would argue that we'd be in a better spot right now with Jack had we been better about it. I would argue that usage matters more than anything else coaches do, and more than anyone might realize. And I don't think it would have come at great cost any season along the way.
Usage is without question one of the biggest ways a coach can impact his teams performance. But talent is the biggest factor in the usage options a coach has. You can't use two scoring lines to divide the focus of the opposing teams efforts to stop you if you can't actually ice two scoring lines.
Also, I completley agree in general that Dahlin will be instantaneously ready for position as a 4D, and maybe as a 3D, and even a small chance at better - but people were jumping on a guy for suggesting that hey, it'd be cool to bring Dahlin in slowly, and I didn't see anything that merited the mild condescension, so I threw my two cents in.
Fair enough.
Ironically what Jack and Risto have been through isn't likely to be an issue for Mitts/Dahlin because of the Jack/Risto in the lineup.