bernmeister
Registered User
Trading Brass/Zucc is really the elephant in the room.
No one really brings it up or wants to, and for good reason. They are hyper fan favorites. They were the team's leading scorers last year.
But they will be 29 when the season starts. They will demand an absolute king's ransom due to their contracts and production.
It's a ballsy move, the type of ballsy move the Rangers don't seem to make. But if you view the next 2+ years as a re-tool, how do they not at least look at this?
Go fully assed, not half assed.
Assuming there are good offers -- a reasonable expectation and I never said just give these guys away --- I say do all 4 at min (+ staal if that can be swung):
Zuc - half price to Ana for Sami V
Stepan +Nanne to Wild for rights to Dumba + Tuch
Brassard - best offer
deal AV fully paid, pay for Marc Staal's place
Staal reduced to 5.0, + throw in(s)
for 12OA Ot 1st + rights to Hoffman
then
Nash + Hoffman + Lindberg for Hertl + cap dump
But it's the same vision every year:
We aren't that bad, really. All we need to do is make a couple changes and we'll be competing for the cup again.
90% of this board never looks beyond next year. 90% of this board wants to go after expensive, already established names because for them, it's all about next year.
At what point do they cross the line and decide that this team needs to take a step back before they can take 2 steps forward? How bad does the team need to be? How bad does our cap situation need to be?
As long as Girardi and Staal are taking up 11.2 mil on the cap, we aren't competing for the cup. They both have NMCs, so getting rid of either of them will be difficult. We don't have the cap space to even keep the team we had this year. Yandle will most likely be gone. For good or ill, E Staal will be gone. We also likely have the expansion draft coming up within the next 2 years, which will through a wrench into the works.
Now is the perfect time to take a step back, rebuild the farm system and inject some youth into the roster. Why wait until we are a bottom 5 team to do it? If we do it right, we can avoid that altogether. The next 2 years should be all about building a team that can compete 3 years from now, and for many years after. If Hank isn't on board with that, he can ask for a trade.
Pearls of wisdom....
Because we can't, simple as that. Not in a salary cap NHL.
As players get older, they do 2 things:
1) They stop getting better
2) They become more expensive
When you can only spend a finite amount of money on your roster, every dollar counts. You have to maximize the value you get. Younger players almost always have a high value to cost ratio. UFA age vets tend to have lower value to cost ratios.
Yandle at 6 mil makes us a worse team than Yandle at 2.65 mil because that's 3.35 mil we can't spend somewhere else. Or Yandle leaves, so no matter what happens, we are likely to be worse next year.
Our farm system is in shambles. We have 2 impact players and a handful of maybes. Without those young players, we are forced to pay a premium for already established players either through trade or UFA. No team can sustain a high level of success that way in the salary cap era. Look at the really successful teams in this league. They win because they draft well. We did that for a while, then we gave up on it so we could "go for it". It's time to stop trying to go for it every year, take a step back, and rebuild the farm system.
Or do you want a repeat of what happened between 1998 and 2004? Because that's were we are headed. We can take our lumps now and be competing again quicker, or we can continue to go for it every year and make the inevitable collapse that much worse.
pearls x 2+