Yep, he just has to show consistency over a longer stretch for me to start considering him part of the future plans.
Well here's the thing. I have been so praising of Colton and harsh on a guy like Volkov because I have a very strict standard I abide by: fundamentals. After 3 to 5 games to get the yips out of his system, a guy should be fundamentally ready. Let all that "don't judge them right away" stuff be saved for them figuring out how to score at the NHL level. If a 4th liner can break in and be even a net neutral I'm happy.
But if you're a Lightning call up there's like a 95% chance you've paid your dues in Syracuse and have 50-150 games of professional experience and you're like +3 to +5 on your draft year. "muh 200 foot game" "muh pucks in deep" and all that boring fundamental nonsense fans are sick of hearing about in interviews of has been drilled into them for YEARS. That's why Cirelli, Gourde, Johnson, Killorn, Palat etc etc have all come into the NHL and gone "boom."
Their success is attributed to that they were fundamentally ready. They just had to figure out how to score. Lightning players who have had 100+ games in Syracuse have no excuse to not be prepared to execute fundamental hockey
Colton is fluid in transition. He is strong on the puck. He is consistently in a position to receive a pass and doesn't really force anything offensively. He could have 0 points and he'd still get an A+ from me because he is a fundamentally sound player who is prepared to meet the demands of our structure and how we score.
Volkov? That's for a different thread