Husko
Registered User
If he was expected to be there and he wasn't, my guess is that we would hear about the judge being royally PO'd.
If he was expected to be there and wasn't there would be a warrant issued for his arrest.
If he was expected to be there and he wasn't, my guess is that we would hear about the judge being royally PO'd.
yeah, very typical for pre-trial stuff. If he was supposed to show up he'd get a bench warrant for contempt of court.If he was expected to be there and he wasn't, my guess is that we would hear about the judge being royally PO'd.
If he was expected to be there and wasn't there would be a warrant issued for his arrest.
Buffalo Sabres forward Ryan O'Reilly was set to appear in court Thursday regarding an impaired driving charge stemming from an incident in early July. That court date has been pushed back to Sept. 10, however, according to AM 980 Radio in London, Ont.
O'Reilly's attorney appeared in court on the player's behalf Wednesday, according to AM980. O'Reilly himself was not present.
O'Reilly's new scheduled court date is set to take place about a week before most NHL training camps open.
The bad news for the Sabres is that they're not going to have a lot of time to react to whatever punishment comes down, if any, from either the court or the NHL or perhaps both. It's not exactly the way a team would want to head into a season following a summer that has seemingly changed the outlook for the club.
Any reason for the delay? Is it something one side or the other would typically request for the date to be pushed back, or is it just because he wasn't personally there?
Any reason for the delay? Is it something one side or the other would typically request for the date to be pushed back, or is it just because he wasn't personally there?
Yeah it's normal if your lawyer is just remanding the case which is what he did. Full disclosure of the case might not be present yet.Is this normal? Not to show up? Was he 100% expected to be in attendance?
Any reason for the delay?
From my familiarity with London 25% to 50% of the fans trying to screw you were Red Wing fans.The court is full of leaf fans trying to screw with our season!
http://www.cbssports.com/nhl/eye-on...-oreillys-court-date-pushed-back-to-september
Sounds like O'Reilly didn't have to appear as long as he was legally represented. In the case where celebrities or pro athletes are involved, I imagine matters are often handled by proxy through lawyers.
It could have been driven by the courts and their staffing/scheduling or that the arresting officer wasn't present as a witness, and had nothing to do with O'Reilly or his lawyer....
haha no.The only information I want to know is if Canadian courts have a tradition of wigs.
The decision was made Thursday morning during O'Reilly's first hearing in London, Ontario, court. The 24-year-old player was not required to attend, and was represented by his lawyer, David Humphrey.
I'm sorry if this has been covered already in the thread.
Back in college I was arrested for a misdemeanor and wasn't allowed to go to Canada while the case was pending (later ACD'd).
Is the reverse true as well? Will ROR be let into the US? Is there some sort of special exemption?
yes, it is easier to get in the US (criminally)
yes, it is easier to get in the US (criminally)
Maybe the Lawyers are trying to work a plea deal and want to stall court proceedings to do so.