Rossi is my pick, as long as he is not displaced from top six as the ‘67s gear up for a long playoff run.
we have so farHe’s sittting well between Felhaber and Keating. As long as that line keeps clicking, I doubt they will make a shuffle. He’s also a year older than the traditional NA Rookies.
He is in the best position amongst all other rookies. Perfetti is maybe the only other player that will get bonafide minutes on a quality team. Byfeld will get minutes but will the Wolves continue to play at a high level? To me it is those three right now. Rossi is in the lead.
Rossi: 22 GP, 14g, 13a, +23. Unlikely that any rookie catches up; but, there will be an opportunity while Rossi is away for WJC..
Will he be away? I think he is in the B side of the tournament. Don’t they play that in the summer?
Schedules can change ... remember Lszczarcyk leaving the wolves to play for Poland over the holidays two seasons ago
No disrespect to Rossi, and I can't claim to have even seen him play even once live, or some of the other top candidates either, but if there is a 16-year-old out there who finishes with close to the same stats as a 17-year-old import player, history shows in favour of the 16-year-old.
Is it fair. Nope. We were in your boat a few years ago with Radek Faksa. Rangers faithful thought he should have won but it went to a 16 year old. (can't even remember who now. Have to look it up).
If I remember correctly, the points were close but it seems they deem a 16-year-old more worthy of the award because it is harder for a 16-year-old to put up points comparable to a 17-year-old import. Usually imports at that age already have more experience against better competition.
I don't know if that's the reason why but it just seems to have been that way at times in the past.
Plus, Rossi is playing with a top team in the country. It could be argued that a 16-year-old on a much lesser team would have a much harder time putting up points with a lesser supporting cast.
Edit:
Just checked the stats. 17 year old import Faksa was on a very good Kitchener team and scored 62-29G, 37A, for 66pts in 62 games.
"Exceptional" player Aaron Ekblad, a d-man, scored 24G, 30A, for 53 points in 58 games on a team that finished last overall the year before.
It may be not the best example, but the fact that Ekblad was two years younger, a defenseman, but still put up those points, gave him the nod.
I'm not going to say Faksa was head and shoulders better and didn't get it because he was a year older and an import, but some argued that they had comparable seasons and the deciding factor was more than likely Ekblad's age and the position he played.
Also, the league is always happy to make sure that whoever their award winners are, they are the type of player that the league can put up front and celebrate in an effort to sell the league.
Who better to win the rookie of the year award that year than the player that OHL executives awarded exceptional player status to? Exactly!
It's like back when Windsor won their two Memorial Cups. Even though Adam Henrique was easily the most valuable player in the tournament, they awarded it to Taylor Hall for no other reason than so that they could pump him up as potential first overall pick in the NHL and Memorial Cup MVP.
Looks great on the cover of the OHL yearbooks etc.
Yeah, I'm a cynical SOB! Lol.
You can throw all the stats you want around but this is a political decision - Byfield wins.
No none of the above for sure - I just see it as the 1st overall pick that agreed to go to Sudbury - league will reward him for that and numbers are close enough that they can internally justify it.There’s no significant evidence from past winners that suggests it is political.
Svechnikov won it last year. Two of the last three winners were European. I don’t think a first overall pick has won it since Travis Konecny.
I am not sure if there is anything political about Byfeld that would seriously matter. The only potential bias would be skin colour and I think the OHL and the game of hockey in general is far beyond token awards based on race or skin colour.
No none of the above for sure - I just see it as the 1st overall pick that agreed to go to Sudbury - league will reward him for that and numbers are close enough that they can internally justify it.
Well hope you are right and let the best rookie win.Barring injury, it is very likely Rossi will outscore Byfeld by a wide margin, probably a good 15-20 points and will have done it in considerably less games. As I write this, he has scored two goals through the first half of today’s game.
I can’t see it. I guess I just don’t understand the importance or significance of rewarding a player with ROY for reporting to a team. That concept is lost on me.
It's always dangerous to extrapolate points over the last half of the season, doubly so when doing it with rookies. Rossi has certainly had a good first half, probably the best of any rookie. But they need to play the second half. It's still close enough that we can't declare a run away winner.Barring injury, it is very likely Rossi will outscore Byfeld by a wide margin, probably a good 15-20 points and will have done it in considerably less games.
It's always dangerous to extrapolate points over the last half of the season, doubly so when doing it with rookies. Rossi has certainly had a good first half, probably the best of any rookie. But they need to play the second half. It's still close enough that we can't declare a run away winner.
Perrault 41 GP, 39 PTS
Rossi 30 GP, 38 PTS
Perfetti 38 GP, 36 PTS
Byfield 39 GP, 34 PTS
Foudy 40 GP, 34 PTS
Any one of these players is capable of finishing at the top of the list. ROY may not go to the top scorer, but just in case let's not spot Rossi a 20 point cushion just yet.
Where were all these good 16 year olds last year?