Hutchinson cleared waivers back in September. For that to expire (that is, for the player to require waivers again), he must either 1) be on the NHL roster for 30 days (including across multiple recalls) or play 10 NHL games, while on a non-emergency recall (or not being loaned following clearing waivers), or 2) play 10 games while on emergency recall (games played while on regular recall do not count towards this total).
In Hutchinson's case, he's played in 9 NHL games this season, which means he does not hit the games played requirement under either criteria. So we have to look at the 30 days on the NHL roster requirement. In that case, any days spent on an NHL roster while under an emergency recall do not count. I certainly don't know whether all of Hutchinson's recalls prior to his most recent one (to replace Sparks) were emergency recalls, and I'm not sure there is really any way to find out since such things aren't always published. That said, we can look at the lengths of Hutchinson's recalls and certainly conclude that at least some of them must have been emergency recalls (as Hutchinson only cleared waivers once this season, which means that his original clearing of waivers did not expire prior to the most recent time he was loaned to the AHL).
Hutchinson was first recalled on 10/7, and was subsequently returned on 11/5. He was recalled again on 11/24 and loaned again on 12/4. Following his trade to Toronto, he was recalled again 1/3 and loaned back on 1/14. His most recent recall began 4/5.
Clearly his first 3 recalls must have totaled more than 30 days, meaning that some (or all) of those three must have been emergency recalls. It isn't unreasonable to assume that they all were. Even with his most recent recall being a regular recall (as I do not think that sending a player away from the team to work on his game can create an emergency condition), that would give him fewer than 30 days spent on the NHL roster while on a regular recall. If any one of his previous recalls was not an emergency recall, then he would require waivers to be sent back down. But I see no reason to assume that is the case, and not knowing any of the specifics I would assume all of his previous recalls were emergency recalls. If that is the case, he should not require waivers to be sent back down.