Mike Smith
Registered User
- Jan 9, 2019
- 76
- 21
1st + prospect.What would the asking price be?
1st + prospect.
2 x 30+ goal scorer, struggling now but his entire team is so it's not a Rakell thing its a Ducks thing. Signed at a very reasonable rate for what he produces for next season as well.
Still the asking price I would assume. Calgary doesn't get Rakell for Bennett and a 2nd is my pointNot a recent 30 goal scorer though, which matters.
He’s playing well on Anaheim, a bit unlucky and no talent around him but I wouldn’t put him in a buy cheap category and I wouldn’t move him for less than a 1st +Not a recent 30 goal scorer though, which matters.
1st + Kuzy? (top 10 protected)1st + prospect.
2 x 30+ goal scorer, struggling now but his entire team is so it's not a Rakell thing its a Ducks thing. Signed at a very reasonable rate for what he produces for next season as well.
1st + prospect.
2 x 30+ goal scorer, struggling now but his entire team is so it's not a Rakell thing its a Ducks thing. Signed at a very reasonable rate for what he produces for next season as well.
Not at all the truth. Pretty much everyone that watches the Ducks regularly has always known he is not a line driver amd his production is greatly influenced by his linemates. Put him with talent and he will easily score 30 again because he has a ton of skill. Put him on a shit Ducks team and his point total falls off. This has always been the case as he moved to different lines and was very predictable, just like how Ducks fans can see him being a 65 point player on a good top line.His highest shooting percentage in a season before or after was 11.72% and in his two 30+ season's they were 18.3% and 14.8%, therefore until he proves he can still score 30, I'd settle down on those dreams, i think you'll get a 2nd +, but if anyone gives up a 1st they aren't adding unless hes at 50%, Rakell is a 40+ point, 2 time 30G and 50+ points, 1 time 20G, he simply had better puck luck those seasons, whens the last time he played a full season? ... yeah that's right....
Not at all the truth. Pretty much everyone that watches the Ducks regularly has always known he is not a line driver amd his production is greatly influenced by his linemates. Put him with talent and he will easily score 30 again because he has a ton of skill. Put him on a shit Ducks team and his point total falls off. This has always been the case as he moved to different lines and was very predictable, just like how Ducks fans can see him being a 65 point player on a good top line.
He was playing with Getzlaf those years mostly, so it makes sense his shooting percentages would be higher when Getzlaf was still performing like a number 1 center because there's going to be higher quality shooting opportunities...His highest shooting percentage in a season before or after was 11.72% and in his two 30+ season's they were 18.3% and 14.8%, therefore until he proves he can still score 30, I'd settle down on those dreams, i think you'll get a 2nd +, but if anyone gives up a 1st they aren't adding unless hes at 50%, Rakell is a 40+ point, 2 time 30G and 50+ points, 1 time 20G, he simply had better puck luck those seasons, whens the last time he played a full season? ... yeah that's right....
The thing with Rakell is that he has a steal of a contract and imagine retained at 50 per cent, the value increases even more. Value should be higher than Coleman s : 1st + good prospect (former late 1st pick), so 1st + Pelletier I d say.
for a UFA 40 point winger we should pay more than we did for 23 year old Dougie Hamilton?
Coleman had 2 years left on his deal
Key word being usually.So you're saying he wasn't shooting at a higher percentage? I guess nhl.com doesn't have good stats? Im going off each season not by players, go ahead and show me the players he played with in those seasons and prove it, if not im not saying anything about it, he clearly had a higher shooting percentage which usually means better puck luck.
Rakell also has 1.5y left. You prefer him because he is a CGY prospect. He may be a bit better but they are the same tierfor a UFA 40-50 point winger we should pay more than we did for 23 year old Dougie Hamilton?
Coleman had 2 years left on his deal. And I much prefer Pelletier to Foote
2nd + Bennett + Emilio Pettersen is what I would offer.
if it gets beat it gets beat
I agree. A team at the top of the pack and up against the cap is obviously going to be more inclined to pay more, especially if the Ducks retain salary. It just doesn't make sense for us, with the expansion implications.Rakell isn't the type of player the Flames should target, and the Flames isn't the target that the Ducks should go after either. Rakells maximum value probably is in trading him to a contender that wants a cheap & solid winger.
AgreeRakell isn't the type of player the Flames should target, and the Flames isn't the target that the Ducks should go after either. Rakells maximum value probably is in trading him to a contender that wants a cheap & solid winger.
And that is the key to any trade the Flames make. If they want to keep a new RW longer term, the player going back would have to be someone that you'd reasonable expect them to protect during the expansion draft.I was pretty excited about the guy earlier but I'm not sure he's a good fit for us. He'd be a rental unless we were into exposing one of Backlund, Dube or Mangi, so that makes the cost considerably higher. Plus his playoff numbers are surprisingly poor and he just seems to similar to what we already have.