Toby Flenderson
Registered User
- Jun 4, 2015
- 3,495
- 982
Because teams notice that. Sheary put up 60 points with Crosby... was he traded for a 1st +? No he wasn’t because he really wasn’t that good.Doesn't change the fact you're downplaying Rakell because of who he played with and pumping Zucker on an unknown future.
Rakell is obviously way better than Sheary but the point stands. If you play with great players that inflate your stats teams will notice.