Ledge And Dairy
Registered User
Ok so Lindholm is the only one listed here that is (still) a top 6C Dube has moved to wing almost full time, Backlund has regressed, Ryan and Janko are bottom 6
Value of: Rhs Dman to Calgary
- Thread starter FameFlame069
- Start date
Americanadian
Registered User
So assuming Lindholm’s line stays the same, a Gaudreau-Ryan-Kapanen line wouldn’t cut it as a top 2 line?
Ledge And Dairy
Registered User
Sounds like the party is over.
I'd be interested. Sheary is small and fast, can be tenacious but also is going to be cleaning the ice with his chest a lot. Vesey is strangely good at xGF on Buffalo but the bloom is off in their PK system compared to his work in NY and of course he isn't going to be a guy who burns up the ice with or without the puck. The wheels are not there for that.
I like Jankowski in the realm of needing centers going forward and the rest of the package almost makes up for what they moved to get Montour in the first place. Might need to be tweaked and of course, Buffalo would likely get less because their GM is a toolbox full of rocks, but I'd be interested.
What if i could offer you the current ranked 20th best defenseman in the league (by nhl.com) who is the 16th highest scoring D right now? He's a right hand shot who has always played the right side.
And you could have him at 2.75 aav this year and next.
As a bonus it's a guy your biggest rival drafted and gave up on.
What would that be worth to you?
And you could have him at 2.75 aav this year and next.
As a bonus it's a guy your biggest rival drafted and gave up on.
What would that be worth to you?
Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 21,217
- 23,654
Only 2 1st round picks go to Rangers, in my deal, NY can pick one at the draft and Calgary can pick one at the draft(so NY will aim for the highest pick, while Calgary would try giving up their lowest, both teams get to choose 1 of the picks) so if we were to make the Finals our pick would be 30 or 31st so NY world want to push it forward, but then Calgary would say "this is the 1st round pick we're selecting to give to you" and then next year we absolutely fall off the cliff and get a top 10 pick(NY would obviously pick this pick) and leave us with our 2022 1st Round pick(where we give up a 3rd round to NYR for not getting the 1st that year)
Well the reason i want a RHD that plays an all around game is for our 2nd line instead of Hamonic, mainly for the future, not Gio injury.
The Hainsey pick up would be for Gio's injury, since we've seen him eat minutes in Car and Tor.
By the time we're any good ? Fleury, brooks, him or another ufa? Draft one with multiple first round picks in a deep draft? who cares? Derniere for Lafreniere!!!!
We keep him to squeeze into a wild card spot next year and lose him for nothing after a first round exit? F that..
Ledge And Dairy
Registered User
He's talking about Petry, Weber's out now too so I doubt they can move him. Maybe in the off season? but they have a lot of young RD coming up
There is an amazing option that solves your needs but apparently he's too good or too important to a bottom 10 team to trade. Won't even dream up an offer. Never change hf .
For a young ish rhd yes especially for next season while we lose some right side guys as in Hamonic is most likely gone and depending on what Brodie wants i would resign him but wouldn't bet on it.
And what exactly are you looking for Petry? Im not giving up a 1st unless he has that 50% retention. But what else is needed? Can we do Hamonic + 1st 20 + ? For Petry at 50%?
Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 21,217
- 23,654
Sure, but that usually isn't the type of transaction that you do, during the approach to deadline, overpayment period. Probably best to do that over the summer.
It’s not actually dumb. We heard the same stuff before Vatanen and Montour got traded. Now look where they are are. What’s dumb is you not reading people’s posts thoroughly, and responding with inaccurate replies.
Yeah well if we bring in a rhd like Montour or Dumba that are youngish and reliable defensively, we could improve on our 2nd line of Hanifin-Hamonic(Dumba/Montour replaces him) and we can trade Hamonic to recoup some of the cost, if we were to wait until the summer we wouldn't be able to trade Hamonic and it'd cost just as much to get the rhd, they'll have some time this season to get to know the team so they don't start in a funk. I have my reasons for the looks of a rhd.
Bounces R Way
Registered User
Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 21,217
- 23,654
Im just using them as examples of who id target, like what are your needs? Lindholm? Id guess?
Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 21,217
- 23,654
It's an interesting deal from the Toronto perspective, but if they are making a move, it really needs to be for a RHD.
Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 21,217
- 23,654
All I'm saying, is Dumba isn't that great defensively. If you are looking for someone to be that defensive anchor, you are going to want to look elsewhere.
