I can guarantee I have attended more live Marlie games than you.
Either that or you don't know what to look for
Let's just say people might be skeptical at your ability to evaluate Leaf players fairly. call it...a hunch?
I can guarantee I have attended more live Marlie games than you.
Either that or you don't know what to look for
Actual scouts likely don't watch 8-10 hours a day of "game film" a week much less a day so i'm also curious as well why this guy has to watch all this AHL hockey?!?!
I wont lie I thought he was going to be more of a force offensively than he's shown.
2 goals in 55 games is extremely underwhelming from a player drafted pretty high and was supposed to have a huge ceiling offensively.
Can still turn out to be a very good player but doesn't look like the offensive dynamo many were hoping for.
Combined regular season and playoffs it's 2 goals in 73GP, which is shocking given that his shot is one of his best tools.
I wont lie I thought he was going to be more of a force offensively than he's shown.
2 goals in 55 games is extremely underwhelming from a player drafted pretty high and was supposed to have a huge ceiling offensively.
Can still turn out to be a very good player but doesn't look like the offensive dynamo many were hoping for.
I wont lie I thought he was going to be more of a force offensively than he's shown.
2 goals in 55 games is extremely underwhelming from a player drafted pretty high and was supposed to have a huge ceiling offensively.
Can still turn out to be a very good player but doesn't look like the offensive dynamo many were hoping for.
I am sure you know this from watching all those Marlie games.10 cent brain
10 cent brain
His shot is not one of his best tools...you can tell you actually watches him play from this past page alone. Lot of stat watchers here.Combined regular season and playoffs it's 2 goals in 73GP, which is shocking given that his shot is one of his best tools.
Pretty much bang on. He might not end up being the 50 point D that some people were hoping for but his play in his own end is coming along way better then expected and at the end of the day if he becomes a top 4 D for us it is a win.Seeing "reports" on Liljegren is like watching a disastrous game of telephone based on two-year old bad information.
People saw "smooth skating OD with IQ issues" and forever locked in him being a Ryan Murphy type.
His IQ issue is a lack of the high end vision needed to be a true offensive creator, the kind of deficiency that will likely limit his statistical output at the highest levels. That being said his defensive game is far better than most realize, and he's lights out in transition. While he may not be an offensive creator, he can definitely a catalyst with his ability to move the puck up ice and generate zone time. I see him ending up somewhere between Spurgeon and Daley.
I can't see who you're quoting but I suspect I made a smart decision in the pastI've noticed you're famous on here for just how serially wrong you seem to be about everything. I mean, you're a train wreck over in the Pettersson thread.
It's to the point now where I actually consider a criticism from you on Liljegren as a compliment.
People forget he’s a teenager playing in the third best league in the world.
Is Cal Foote a bust? Urho Vaakanainen? These are his fellow 2017 1st rounders. Liljegren is outscoring and outplaying them both so far.
That doesnt mean bust it just means a future 50 point dman like some fans were talking about seems pretty unikely