I am shocked he dropped to 6 tbh.Been saying it for years, this kid is amazing!.
- 6th overall steal.
As opposed to whatI am shocked he dropped to 6 tbh.
Going 4th for 5th. There was even some rumblings that LA really liked him, but then they got the 2nd ovr.As opposed to what
Laf, byfield, stutzle were clearly top 3.
there was a bunch of forwards in the mix with drysdale/sanderson
The only mildly shocking thing to me was Buffalo picking Quinn over Rossi and Perfetti. I love Drysdale, but Raymond, Holtz, and Sanderson were appealing also. Rossi and Perfetti had their very rabid fans to, even among scouts.
I don't think neither Raymond nor Holtz becomes impact players to the NHL, not in the extent what Drysdale will be.
Hmm, I think it's the opposite. I see Drydale having the higher ceiling but possibly flaming out earlier, while Sanderson will have the better chance to last a long time due to his size and all round skills.18 year looking like a top pairing Dman in the AHL so far. I still think #6 made sense, as much as I see Drysdale in the league 20 years I'd still put his potential behind Sanderson, who is going to be a monster in a couple years.
Going 4th for 5th. There was even some rumblings that LA really liked him, but then they got the 2nd ovr.
I think theyre both 20 year guys and very close in many metrics. Drysdale probably a more dynamic skater, but effortless strides for Sanderson. Both have top pairing awareness in all zones. Main reason I'd say Sandos got the higher ceiling is because he's going to be more physically imposing, taking up more space and reach to go along with that IQ.Hmm, I think it's the opposite. I see Drydale having the higher ceiling but possibly flaming out earlier, while Sanderson will have the better chance to last a long time due to his size and all round skills.
Hmm, I think it's the opposite. I see Drydale having the higher ceiling but possibly flaming out earlier, while Sanderson will have the better chance to last a long time due to his size and all round skills.
They are both going to be really good players any team would be hyped to have either one of themI think theyre both 20 year guys and very close in many metrics. Drysdale probably a more dynamic skater, but effortless strides for Sanderson. Both have top pairing awareness in all zones. Main reason I'd say Sandos got the higher ceiling is because he's going to be more physically imposing, taking up more space and reach to go along with that IQ.
Kings were in that weird spot this year even if you loved drysdale or sanderson, no way you could pick 1 over byfield or stutzle.... just way too much potential from those players.Yep--same thing with Zegras too, Blake maybe needs to stop hanging out across town
I'm pretty convinced LA was going with Drysdale if they picked outside top 3.
I am shocked he dropped to 6 tbh.
Going 4th for 5th. There was even some rumblings that LA really liked him, but then they got the 2nd ovr.
The question for me about Drysdale is will he use all that skill in an offensive role (like Q. Hughes) or will he be an overall guy like SN was. I was always left wanting more from SN offensively. 740 points in 1263 games over 18 seasons wasn't exactly Bourque-like. Will Anaheim be able to build a potent offense around Zegras quickly enough? Lots of questions but what's not a question is this guy talent. Unreal IQ.
This kid is very very good, and I am glad he is getting to play in the AHL instead of juniors
Yeah some guys are in that middle ground where they aren't ready for the NHL but also might not benefit much from staying in Juniors. If he does have to go back i'm sure the OHL will seem alot slower to himThis makes me with players could go straight to the AHL. He is probably getting so much more out of this year then he would have in the CHL.