You don't go with a mystery box when you can take a 23 year old d-man who'll at worst be a Norris finalist.
You don't go with a mystery box when you can take a 23 year old d-man who'll at worst be a Norris finalist.
Or people forget that Dahlin isn’t remotely close to Fox defensively. Could he be? One day but currently it’s not close.Good poll
I’ll go with Dahlin. He’s being really underrated this season because of the team he plays for and how terrible and toxic they are.
This is a guy that scored at a 0.5 point per game clip as a 17 year old in the SEL, then followed it up by putting up 44 points in his 18 year old rookie year, and 40 points in 59 games in his 19 year old sophomore season. I think people forget all of this.
Dahlin has issues defensively but this is still a bit like selecting Letang over Hedman in 2012. Yeah, Letang is damn good and all. But over the course of 10 years it's just extremely unlikely that we don't start seeing Dahlin turn into the player he obviously has potential to be.Or people forget that Dahlin isn’t remotely close to Fox defensively. Could he be? One day but currently it’s not close.
I’m merely commenting on a poster that is using prior point totals to say Dahlin > Fox, like people forgot how much hype Dahlin has/had. We don’t know for sure what either of them will continue to develop into but we do know they’re both young so they’re both not finished products. We also know Fox is excelling on both ends of the ice which is why comparing point totals is odd to me.Dahlin has issues defensively but this is still a bit like selecting Letang over Hedman in 2012. Yeah, Letang is damn good and all. But over the course of 10 years it's just extremely unlikely that we don't start seeing Dahlin turn into the player he obviously has potential to be.
Dahlin has issues defensively but this is still a bit like selecting Letang over Hedman in 2012. Yeah, Letang is damn good and all. But over the course of 10 years it's just extremely unlikely that we don't start seeing Dahlin turn into the player he obviously has potential to be.
I’m merely commenting on a poster that is using prior point totals to say Dahlin > Fox, like people forgot how much hype Dahlin has/had. We don’t know for sure what either of them will continue to develop into but we do know they’re both young so they’re both not finished products. We also know Fox is excelling on both ends of the ice which is why comparing point totals is odd to me.
Letang was a 50 point player at 23.Adam Fox is competing with prime Hedman for Norris trophy as 23 years old. Letang was 30 points player at that age.
Fox is there for 40 games during a shortened and nothing-like-normal season.I've been a massive Dahlin supporters since he was drafted and I still think he has huge potential.
That being said, what's his upside, realistically? Norris-level?
Fox is there.
How on earth is Dahlin winning ? Fox is proving to be an elite #1D, Dahlin has been awful so far.