I think Musgrove is today, and Williams tomorrow. I agree that he should recorrect soon. Without looking at numbers, I suspect the issues with him come down to strikeouts and walks. In general, he's a pitch to weak contact type guy, and when he was really dealing earlier this year, he was also getting tons of Ks. However, his walks have seemed to also go up. I'd imagine these aren't too out of whack given that FIP, but I think part of the path out of his slump for him is figuring out what kind of pitcher he'll be.
I think in general, he has limited upside, but is still an incredibly useful pitcher to have at 3,4,5 in the rotation. His issue is really more that most of the other pitchers are somewhere similar to him, than anything he's doing specifically. We need Taillon to get at that next level, and hopefully Musgrove too. As we're built, all of the pitching can be adequate enough to really give a solid foundation to an offense that's clicking well, but there are enough question marks both with many of them and in the bullpen that it can come crumbling down quickly.
Craig definitely doesn't look like a good pick. I guess he's at least somewhat less of a big deal if you are high enough on Bell. Newman, Kramer have seemed solid, as has a lot of the secondary pitching in the high minors: Eppler, McRae, Holmes (who makes the most sense to me as someone to convert to bullpen). Altoona looks ok: Hayes has broken out of his slump, Martin obviously, some pitchers headlined by Keller. WV is where the best stories might lie, with Mitchell, Stafford, and (to some extent) Cruz.
I think nobody besides Mitchell and Martin are doing much to jump off the page, but the system is about where you'd expect for a solid, but not great one. I'd like to see Keller even more dominant, but he's not a disappointment really. The biggest one is Tucker, who had tons of hype for this year but has fallen off. It's been met with Newman really hitting, and I would like to get a look at his defense in Pittsburgh, but he's probably going to be a victim of Kang's re-emergence, so I doubt we see him unless there's an injury to Mercer.
The cluster of infielders promises to be an interesting story. Harrison is the most obvious trade candidate, and if we're out of it at the deadline, he makes a lot of sense to shop aggressively, since 2B can be filled pretty easily without even tapping Kramer or Newman. I doubt Kang or Moran would be players we'd look to move, and Mercer would only have value in a very specific situation. I like Kramer a good bit for that 2B spot, solid glove and some LH pop, but really, the prospect of selling doesn't interest me a lot. There's something to be said for maxing value on guys like Harrison and Cervelli, but the general issue we seem to keep coming up against is that we're built to be a little above average, but lacking in the real impact players that we'll take us over the top. I don't think any trade is going to fix that, outside of going after a front line starter, or Machado (which obviously isn't happening).
It's a topic for another day, but Fulmer is pretty intriguing as a trade candidate. You have to assume the Tigers will just wait, as there's not much utility in trading him when he's mediocre, but maybe there's a shot for an outside the box trade, centered around us giving up some young MLB talent plus also some prospects. I realize this absolutely sounds like the kind of bullshit that armchair fans say all the time, but if we start a package with Kuhl, Frazier and/or Osuna, then I don't think it's insane to wonder if we could land Fulmer without moving Baz or Meadows. Maybe tap into the depth arms as sweeteners, and utilize Martin or Mitchell as a bigger prospect piece.
It wouldn't make a ton of sense for Detroit, but that's also only on the assumption that Fulmer will really restore value in a future year. The Kuhl starter would really be the big question mark, but as a partial change of scenery type thing, and partially the Tigers trying to spread out some pieces (landing some DH/1B/OF help that's already proven, some backend starting depth), maybe it's not too much of a fantasy. People seem not to love Fulmer because he's not a strikeout pitcher through and through, but he seems like the kind of guy who would get a definite boost in the NL. It would not be unlike Musgrove.