Last time they went into a break like this, they came out and lost like 5 of 7 after the most dramatic series ever against the Cards.
Yeah, I think a series vs the Reds immediately after the break is pretty foreboding. On paper and totally in the abstract, having 7 games vs the Reds and Mets in the first 10 after the break is pretty close to ideal, but whether the reality will actually bare that out...
I think it's sort of a cop out to just say that it all comes down to the pitching, but it's basically true. We've seen small stretches of very concentrated good pitching, and that lays the foundation for 7-3 ten-game stretches, which we need multiple of in short order. Can the bullpen keep it up? Santana and Crick have turned into weapons, and Vazquez is as good as he's ever been. The rotation is basically built for eating 6 innings, with some guys maybe occasionally tipping over that. Can we get something consistently better from Taillon, Musgrove, and/or Kingham? If so, the foundation is right there to jump back into the thick of things.
I think it's less about the total stretch of games we'll need than it is about the next 40 games or so. We need to catapult ourselves back to 4 games behind or so in the race in the first week and a half or two after the break, and after that, pretty much all of the games besides a handful are with playoff race teams or fringe playoff race teams like us.
We're sitting about where you'd expect for the talent level of this team, except the path has been filled with the usual Pirate dramatics. I think there's enough talent assembled that if everything's clicking, they can get back to a more firmly relevant team, but at the end of the day I still think the 78-82 win range is pretty likely. I very much hope I'm wrong, and if nothing else, the last several games were a nice panacea for so much ugliness in the past two months.