Howe Elbows 9
Registered User
My current top 3 is Kaprizov, Robertson and Smith. There are many talented rookie goalies this season, so at least one of them would make my top 5...
So, like 49pts in a shortened seasonIn the last 10 years the only 70+ pts rookies are Panarin and Barzal. If Kaprizov hit that mark, he wins it no question.
In the last 10 years the only 70+ pts rookies are Panarin and Barzal. If Kaprizov hit that mark, he wins it no question.
In this race? Donzo.Pretty sure Kappo Kahkonen ended what was left of his Calder hopes tonight.
Getting shelled
In this race? Donzo.
Klingberg had a 50 point pace his rookie season, but he also got a late start to the season because the Stars had too full of a roster to start his rookie year.How many 50+ point rookie defensemen in those 10 years (if Smith picks up his pace a little bit).
Swayman
Sorokin and Nedeljkovic look good
Makar won it last year and Ekblad in 14/15. Forwards are just more dynamic than D men so they seem to focus on that.3 finalists probably kaprizov, Robertson, Smith, with one of the forwards taking it cuz forward bias.
Nevermind Makar winning it last year
I edited my comment after you quoted it to add more context.apparently all a rookie dman needs to do is go close to point/game...
There have been 3 dmen in the last 16 years.
Perhaps I should have called it points bias.
Forwards are just more flashy and put up points more so than D men which is probably why they are more likely to get the calder.I edited my comment after you quoted it to add more context.
apparently all a rookie dman needs to do is go close to point/game...
There have been 3 dmen in the last 16 years.
Perhaps I should have called it points bias.
Robertson making this a race. Hopefully Smith picks it back up down the stretch.
If Robertson continues to close the gap, this could end up like 2014-15 where Stone or Gaudreau should have won the Calder, but since neither them broke away from the pack in scoring (both had 64 points and Filip Forsberg had 63), it went to a defenseman in Ekblad, even though he only had 39 points.
Recall that for the Calder you voters submit a ranked list of 5 players, and players receive points for votes (more points for higher ranking).
That year both Stone (154) and Gaudreau (157) got more total Calder votes than Ekblad (151) as well as more top 3 votes (138 for Stone and Gaudreau, 134 for Ekblad). So Ekblad won the Calder despite being left off of more ballots and top 3 lists than the two guys ahead of him.
There's a scenario where it finishes up like:
Kaprizov 56gp 46p
Robertson 51gp 44p
Smith 56gp 30p
If that's the case, I think would give Smith a real shot at the Calder, as a lot of the votes for a forward might get split between Kaprizov and Robertson. Smith could win the Calder while taking home less total votes.