Blackjack
Registered User
Wow, who would've thought that Ty Smith would end up being by far the best among these guys.
Its been two years of you being wrong and you still cant admit it. Terrific stuff.You've had almost two years to re-read this thread and you still can't read that I called Hughes the better skater, lmao.
Also, Hughes was always closer to the NHL, Boqvist is a project, both still look to be potential 1D one day.
Its been two years of you being wrong and you still cant admit it. Terrific stuff.
Thats why the bookmark tool is so terrific.
Wow, who would've thought that Ty Smith would end up being by far the best among these guys.
It speaks more about the person, kind of person that is severely lacking in humility to be wrong. That's the kind of person that has to be right about everything irl, gets on everyone's bad side. Same with Pavel Buch who I've seen...basically everywhere arguing with people.Its been two years of you being wrong and you still cant admit it. Terrific stuff.
Thats why the bookmark tool is so terrific.
Hughes hit his ceiling at 20?Wrong because Hughes hit his ceiling faster? What happens if Boqvist catches up? And why does it matter so much that you bookmarked it lmao
It speaks more about the person, kind of person that is severely lacking in humility to be wrong. That's the kind of person that has to be right about everything irl, gets on everyone's bad side. Same with Pavel Buch who I've seen...basically everywhere arguing with people.
Hughes hit his ceiling at 20?
Just take the L and put this behind you.
@Pavel Buchnevich is one of the best prospect source on this board, we don't always agree on everything but at least he can defend a position and is knowledeable, what do you bring aside from out of context opinions about HF posters ? Thanks, the hike is this way.
You think he's going to be a 1.20 ppg player ? There is no L to take, I won't take it until Boqvist and Smith have both busted and shown they don't belong in the conversation. Both are tracking very well too, and Hughes ain't having the hot start even if he has the stats.
@Pavel Buchnevich is one of the best prospect source on this board, we don't always agree on everything but at least he can defend a position and is knowledeable, what do you bring aside from out of context opinions about HF posters ? Thanks, the hike is this way.
You think he's going to be a 1.20 ppg player ? There is no L to take, I won't take it until Boqvist and Smith have both busted and shown they don't belong in the conversation. Both are tracking very well too, and Hughes ain't having the hot start even if he has the stats.
I didn't like Miller either in hsi draft year, he had some very real flaws, partly because he had just transitioned to defense, maybe. I have been wrong plenty of times too, just like anyone that dares having an opinion.That's hilarious that people have such a high opinion of Pavel Buchnevich on this board whereas he stopped posting on the Rangers board because people on the Rangers board know he's a fraud. Dude compared K'Andre Miller to Sean Day over and over.
Hughes' defensive shortcomings are being exaggerated after a poor start. He's got his defensive game back to a respectable level, which is all anyone can really ask for from a guy who dominates the flow of a game like he does. Considering that Hughes has some of the most impressive stats for a young defender in the history of the game, Boqvist would have to end up pretty amazing to match up. And I'm not saying he won't be great defender but I haven't seen anything from him that indicates he'll be a superstar like Hughes.Hughes is better right now, but Boqvist has a higher ceiling IMO because he has traits that can lead to being an all around D whereas Hughes will always be a liability at D. Hughes is a guaranteed stud though and we are projecting Boqvist can get there.. I take Hughes easily as of now with a caveat that Boqvist has higher potential.
Vancouver fans are really aggressive when it comes to Hughes. They attack incessantly. You'd think right now they might keep their mouths shut, and be open to the idea that he may not be an elite 1D and he may need to improve on some parts of his game to become an elite 1D, but I guess on a website like this you are never accountable, so some will continue at all times.
Its because you came on all last year claiming again and again that Hughes wasn't good, (based on your viewing of him in College), to the point where Shesterkin was a better Calder candidate in 12 GP (than Makar aswell).
Barely watched Hughes play yet had no problems making the judgements, and everytime people pushed back you just ignored the fact that you had barely watched & pushed on w/ no sufficient response.
I don't think your the one to be criticizing others for accountability in judgements.
...
Vancouver fans are really aggressive when it comes to Hughes. They attack incessantly. You'd think right now they might keep their mouths shut, and be open to the idea that he may not be an elite 1D and he may need to improve on some parts of his game to become an elite 1D, but I guess on a website like this you are never accountable, so some will continue at all times.
Doesn't Hughes also have the worst GF% in the league at 5 on 5 this season by a substantial margin or is he now no longer in last place?