DonnyNucker
Registered User
- Mar 28, 2017
- 4,002
- 2,896
Ya that’s not how it worksBasically let Judd and Gradin make the picks and keep BenningBrod out of it.
Ya that’s not how it worksBasically let Judd and Gradin make the picks and keep BenningBrod out of it.
Ya that’s not how it works
Oh ok understand your point. Benning does scout a sh!t load compared to other GMs...but likely their top 50 and not many players they have selected in the mid rounds. Agreed, feel better having Brackett running the showI think it more or less does.
How much in-depth scouting can a GM do? How much would Benning have seen guys like Madden/Gaudette to have the credibility to overrule Judd? Maaaaybe first rounders, but you're basically just going to have to leave it to your scouts. They're going to have had way more eyes on the players.
And I much, much rather prefer Judd or Gradin to make the choices than Benning
Wayne thinks 50% of the NHL is better than him.
Completely agree but it would be interesting as well to see the difference Ovechkin's shot would look like using those wood sticks they used in Gretzky's era.To be fair a lot of current players would be monsters in Gretzky's era. It's impossible to compare eras due to the advancements in body science, training, general understanding of hockey.
What makes guys like Gretzky great is that he was just decades ahead of his time rather than raw talent. He understood the game far better than anyone else in the league at the same time did, but so do a lot of current players in the NHL. Don't tell me that Ovechkin wouldn't be an absolute monster if he played in 1987
Where does this narrative that benning scouts more than other gms come from?
Considering how poor he is in the other areas of being a gm wouldn’t it be prudent that he spend more time there to improve?
It comes from fact, reality, evidence, observation, truth, etc.
To answer your second question, no. If you look around the league what makes or breaks virtually all team success is scouting/drafting and developing so it would be most prudent to focus on that.
Oh ok understand your point. Benning does scout a sh!t load compared to other GMs...but likely their top 50 and not many players they have selected in the mid rounds. Agreed, feel better having Brackett running the show
Because I listen to him. He is a rink ratHow do you know Benning scouts more compared to other GM’s?
Scouting and development is not the only thing..but on a rebuilding team,I would say its the most imperative.Scouting and development is a subset of what makes a team successful, it’s not the only thing.
What facts do you have? None of reality,evidence, observation truth have been shown, your saying it because you want to believe it. I’m asking a legit question has there been a quote or any shred of evidence that he spends more time doing it than other gms?
Hockey management is like a big corporation.
Benning is like the CEO. He delegates a lot to scouts like Brackett. But in the end he’s responsible for hiring and firing the scouts, listening to the various scouts give their views on players in the areas where they scout and then making the final decision. Brackett is just one of the guys he hears from him.
In the end Benning wears the draft picks for better or worse. So Virtanen and Juolevi rest on him just like EP, Hughes, Boeser and the rest do as well.
He wears them, but that's because people like to attribute the picks to the GM.Hockey management is like a big corporation.
Benning is like the CEO. He delegates a lot to scouts like Brackett. But in the end he’s responsible for hiring and firing the scouts, listening to the various scouts give their views on players in the areas where they scout and then making the final decision. Brackett is just one of the guys he hears from him.
In the end Benning wears the draft picks for better or worse. So Virtanen and Juolevi rest on him just like EP, Hughes, Boeser and the rest do as well.
Because I listen to him. He is a rink rat
In the last 2 seasons did Jim Benning say they were competing for a 'playoff spot' ,or simply being 'competitive'...?So when Jim benning says he’s always scouting we listen to him and take him at his word.
When Jim benning says we are competing for a playoff spot the last 5 years we don’t listen to his word,
Correct?
Agreed. I would normally give a GM a pass for their first draft since the scouts operated under a different set of criteria. But Benning did seem to influence some of the picks so you could credit him for the 2014 draft for better or for worse.
Would it matter considering we know benning lies outright?In the last 2 seasons did Jim Benning say they were competing for a 'playoff spot' ,or simply being 'competitive'...?
I presume most Canuck fans are salivating at the thought of Hughes with the Alien on the PP.
Yeah which picks were these?
Going off our pro scouting Benning's always at the wrong rink
You know we're talking about the draft here right? It's the amateur scouts that do most of the work?
I think Benning had a role in the Demko and Tryamkin picks by virtue of Benning not having a problem with drafting goalies high and Russians.