GDT: Quarterfinal - May 17 - Sweden vs Latvia

Name Nameless

Don't go more than 10 seconds back on challenges
Apr 12, 2017
6,562
3,039
You are allowed to be in the crease and even have incidental contact with the goalie if you are playing the puck, which is what both players were doing. Not a goalie interference.

In fact, the person who knocked the puck out of Merzlikins' cover was Blugers.

You are not allowed to wait for the puck in the crease. Perhaps in the NHL, but not in the rest of the world.
 

Fossy21

Nobel Prize Deke
Mar 14, 2013
20,242
2,314
So an obvious goal is disallowed because the ref blew the whistle (or intended to) while the puck was still moving over the goal line and then Sweden gets one allowed despite a rugby scrum in the crease (which TSN very carefully tried to ignore with only two looks at it both from the vantage point of Anders Nilsson) Where are the behind the net angles? I fear the fix is in...

Yup, refs sure are looking for any old excuse to call penalties on Latvia. Fixed indeed. :laugh:
 

Zippgunn

Registered User
May 15, 2011
3,984
1,675
Lhuntshi
Yup, refs sure are looking for any old excuse to call penalties on Latvia. Fixed indeed. :laugh:
Who said anything about penalties? The refs called off an obvious goal and then allowed one where it sure looked like there was clear goalie interference. Hard to tell when the powers that be refuse to show any kind of detailed replay. Who provides TSN with the video feed, Swedish TV?
 

Macbanan

Registered User
Dec 28, 2013
1,270
1,172
Uppsala, Sweden
The way i see it:
2 bogus minor penalty calls on Sweden
1 bogus whistle to nullify Latvia's goal.
One wasted goalie interference challenge.

Now please don't take penalties. Play simple.
 

kabidjan18

Registered User
Apr 20, 2015
5,787
2,113
authockeytxreports.wordpress.com
Who said anything about penalties? The refs called off an obvious goal and then allowed one where it sure looked like there was clear goalie interference. Hard to tell when the powers that be refuse to show any kind of detailed replay. Who provides TSN with the video feed, Swedish TV?
Like has already been said. There's no goalie interference if contact is incidentally initiated in the process of playing the puck...
 

McClelland

Registered User
Aug 2, 2011
4,358
956
Bergen
Im pretty sure that latvias 2-2 goal had been disallowed anyway! The Latvia player run into Nilsson and the puck went in, signal or not!
 

Fossy21

Nobel Prize Deke
Mar 14, 2013
20,242
2,314
Who said anything about penalties? The refs called off an obvious goal and then allowed one where it sure looked like there was clear goalie interference. Hard to tell when the powers that be refuse to show any kind of detailed replay. Who provides TSN with the video feed, Swedish TV?

You sure didn't. Hence why I pointed it out, along with the ridiculous claim that the officials are somehow favouring Sweden. Quick whistles happen all the time.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad