I don’t agree with this. Salah has the most touches in the box this season. Firmino and Mane touched the ball more than anyone in the league because Salah and Sterling this season. It doesn’t mean that the refs are against them but it’s a little disingenuous to say Liverpool don’t get PKs because they only shoot one timers.The reason why Liverpool has less penalties is because our assists come from fullbacks who pass the ball to players who immediately shoot. Can't get penalties when the other team doesn't even have time to close players down, and I think this little bit of tactical play will start to be adopted by a lot of teams. The second reason is because the other goals usually come from fast counters.
Liverpool doesn't shoot the ball a lot compared to other top teams, but when their players decide to try to score, they will try to do it immediately. The big Fabinho goals and the goals against Newcastle last weekend are pretty good examples of this.
I mean Salah alone overhandles the ball in the box constantly. Yes the fullbacks create a lot of chances but Liverpool often have a lot of touches in and around the box without shooting or going off quickly, as the stats show and if you watch. van Dijk alone probably should have had 12 penalties for the way he’s mugged every set piece tbh.I don’t agree with this. Salah has the most touches in the box this season. Firmino and Mane touched the ball more than anyone in the league because Salah and Sterling this season. It doesn’t mean that the refs are against them but it’s a little disingenuous to say Liverpool don’t get PKs because they only shoot one timers.
No, i'm saying you're implying they were favoured by ref.
You're not the only one doing it, it's been a Liverpool fans complaint (at least 3 different off the top of my head) for weeks now.
Yet when countered by facts, not stats (pens were deserved except 2), you just say, well it's just a stat, nothing more.
Yeah you almost fooled us.
He would have needed to play 4 more games to meet the minimum criteria, but his WhoScored rating was still lower than Willems which is what that is based on. Willems barely made the criteria either as he only made 19 appearances, the minimum required. Tierney made 15 appearances.My bet is if Tierney isn't injured most of the season he gets in as the LB.
WhoScored doesn’t really score keepers well. They also eel to favor the ones that see the most action (at CB especially too, Mustafi always seems to grade out near the top with the Burnley guys); it’s better for offensive players though, in my opinion anywayHenderson at 6.72 seems low, although I haven't really looked at how they score keepers and that's a notoriously hard position to boil down to a simple number.
The Saudis have withdrawn their bid for Newcastle United. Thus ends the weirdest chapter in the history of a club whose last quarter of a century is crammed with episodes of absurdity.
What next? Will it turn out that the reason Joelinton can't score is because he suffered a Freaky Friday-style accident, and finds himself trapped in the body of Jack Black?
All eyes turn to an alleged American billionaire's alleged bid. Mind, he's already had to deny that his interest was a put-up job perpetrated at Qatar's behest to throw a spanner in the works of the Saudi takeover.
Meanwhile, pity the agents and clubs weeping over the lost 40% premium they'd expected to tack on to every single transaction Saudicastle attempted.
The only reason it died is the piracy issue too.
Take my eyes but don't f*** with my tv royalties
Quite.
I must say, although before the NUFC takeover bid began I was aware of the Khashoggi affair, and Saudi Arabia's general reputation on the human rights front is hard to miss, I hadn't been up to speed with the beoutQ shenanigans. As such, it's been really startling to contemplate the puerility of the Saudis' behaviour towards their Qatar rivals.
Until Jamal Khashoggi's disappearance I'd never heard of him, and I'm sure I'm not alone in that. The fact of his death, the melodramatic circumstances surrounding it, and the grotesque manner of his killing could hardly have been better calculated to attract attention. The outcome is that his work gained a symbolic power even for those who read not a word he ever wrote. Khashoggi's murder wasn't only an atrocious act, it was a profoundly stupid, self-defeating one.
Perhaps the above is too much politics for site rules, so I've thought better of touching on the Saudi-Russia price war, or Yemen. Mind, to discuss this particular takeover and steer clear of the political rocks is a signal challenge.
There's a droll irony in the fact that this project, undertaken to create positive PR, has only succeeded in making the people behind it look even more arrogant, stupid, and incompetent than they did previously. Leaving aside the moral concerns about the bid, the way it has collapsed has hardly allayed my suspicion that, given the chance to take a tilt at the Premier League, the PiF would have run Newcastle like a nightmarish amalgam of Peter Lim, Tony Fernandes and Venky's. With blood-stained hands.
I wouldnt say self defeating considering there wasnt any consequences.
Yes. Who scored grade is shit for defenseman and goaltender.WhoScored doesn’t really score keepers well. They also eel to favor the ones that see the most action (at CB especially too, Mustafi always seems to grade out near the top with the Burnley guys); it’s better for offensive players though, in my opinion anyway
I guess you're less cynical than I am. From my perspective, they got away with it, nobody really mentions it anymore and they continue to fund as well as foster certain groups. Yeah, I hear a lot less MBS is a reformer BS but that was always going to happen.In terms of criminal justice, for sure there were no consequences.
But the attempt to portray the Crown Prince as a 'reformer' has suffered damage, requiring various empty PR manoeuvres that no one on earth can have been convinced by, which in itself proves that the Saudis felt matters had become serious enough something needed to be seen to be done. Meanwhile, an awful lot of electrons have been expended to try and discredit Khashoggi even since his death. In eliminating a man who was an annoyance, they've simply created an embarrassment. And Crown Princes tend to dislike embarrassment.
The Saudis have withdrawn their bid for Newcastle United. Thus ends the weirdest chapter in the history of a club whose last quarter of a century is crammed with episodes of absurdity.
What next? Will it turn out that the reason Joelinton can't score is because he suffered a Freaky Friday-style accident, and finds himself trapped in the body of Jack Black?
All eyes turn to an alleged American billionaire's alleged bid. Mind, he's already had to deny that his interest was a put-up job perpetrated at Qatar's behest to throw a spanner in the works of the Saudi takeover.
Meanwhile, pity the agents and clubs weeping over the lost 40% premium they'd expected to tack on to every single transaction Saudicastle attempted.
As a Newcastle fan, I'm annoyed at the Premier League. If you didn't want the Saudis owning Newcastle, then your owner's test should have been completed months ago. Either you pass them or fail them, but by waiting until the Saudis pulled out just showed a complete lack of courage by the Premier League. If they wanted to decline based on human rights/piracy, they could have done so. But now they just look weak by not doing anything.