sasha barkov
Registered User
- Nov 4, 2016
- 1,851
- 1,344
If you’re trading Forsberg you’re getting offensive prospects back
Haula, please. A 2nd?Feels like 99% of this thread has been about Ekholm, Forsberg, and Granlund -
Does anyone want a nice Eric Haula? How about Matt Benning? Or Rocco Grimaldi, Brad Richardson, Nick Cousins, Mark Borowiecki?
Haula, please. A 2nd?
in what world would any team be happy about their chances to compete for a cup with Holl on the top pairThat defense is terrible
Seems like an odd list. Rinne? Ellis being “untouchable” seems like a stretch. Would have expected Forsberg and Josi.
I hate that the team lately looking to move premium assets/selloff are always within Chicago's division and just makes it a deal breaker almost immediately
columbus
winnipeg
minnesota
nashville
yeah it's just more rare because there is a premium added to an in division team asking price vs outsideIt shouldn't be a deal breaker. Refusing to trade within the division is stupid and Poile has made some significant trades within the division in the last 5 years with Minnesota, Chicago and Colorado so I don't think he's opposed to it even though he got f***ed over in every one.
Ironically, a trade for Forsberg is set by the Forsberg trade. Martin Erat (with 1.5 years left, age 32) was traded for prospect Filip Forsberg (age 20, 11th overall pick). What's different is the possibility of cap retention, which the Preds would want compensation.
So TML fans, history has set the price as Nick Robertson + for Forsberg. The plus depends on how much cap the Preds eat and if there are conditions on the pick.
Would you consider the following given that Toronto wants to keep Robertson to try to compete now?
To Nashville
Alex Kerfoot (Money)
Rodion Amirov
2021 2nd round pick
To Toronto
Filip Forsberg @ 50% retained
Obviously you could turn around and flip Kerfoot to a number of teams, for additional assetts. He likely fetches you at least a 2nd round pick on the market, meaning the deal turns into some like Amirov and 2x 2nd round picks for Forsberg.
It's out of respect. Clearly he wouldn't be bringing back a whole lot.Imagine present day Rinne being an "untouchable" let's hope for Preds fans sakes that Friedman is out to lunch here.
probably it's about the add-ons to unload his contract.38 Pekka Rinne is untouchable? That makes no sense.
it would cost nashville a first or even more to move him.It's out of respect. Clearly he wouldn't be bringing back a whole lot.
it would cost nashville a first or even more to move him.
Amirov and a 2nd doesn't get it done by itself. When you're asking us to take Kerfoot and retain half on Forsberg, it's not even close.
Kerfoot has similar number to Forsberg this year while playing 3rd line minutes, and he's half the salary. I don't think that deal is good for Nashville, but Kerfoot isn't exactly a salary dump.
Jarnkrok (50% retained) + Granlund for Compher + 1st + B prospect
Thoughts on that?
Wait... what? Why would the Leafs trade out of a position of weakness (their blue line) for yet another star forward? This makes no sense. Toronto isn't trading its 1D for Forsberg.Forsberg for Rielly + What Preds Fans?
The retention to get Jarnkrok at $1m next season is what makes it worth including a 1st.Would be better to have the retention on Granlund IMO
I'm a little uneasy about taking Compher - his numbers are a bit spooky for his cap hit
The retention to get Jarnkrok at $1m next season is what makes it worth including a 1st.
The idea with getting Jarnkrok and Granlund together is to have Jarnkrok at 3LW and Granlund at 3C (with Donskoi at 3RW). How do you think that line would work?That's fair, although if you're getting Jarnkrok to be a 3C you might want to know he hasn't played center fulltime in about 3 years.