Gudbranson to the Leafs for Carrick+2nd
And to the person who said Carrick is a throw in he very much is not. He's a little undersized but he's a good young defender who can actually grow offensively. I'd say he'd fit in nicely on the 3rd pairing right side. He's behind Tanev and Stecher but not bad by any means.
Hutton-Tanev
Edler-Stecher
MDZ-Carrick
Pouliot-Biega
I actually like that better than with Guddy.
I also know that Babcock doesn't trust Carrick with PKing duties but that doesn't mean Travis won't use him there.
Gudbranson to the Leafs for Carrick+2nd
And to the person who said Carrick is a throw in he very much is not.
Edler only ever put up points by collecting secondary assists on Sedin goals when they were running the most lethal PP in the game.
Id rather keep him,,he has been great,,Dump MarkyNilsson to CGY at the deadline for a 3rd or something.
Markstrom now to Edmonton or a team in need of a 1b goalie at the deadline. Seems pretty straightforward to me.
To sens
Tanev
To nux
Thomas Chabot
2019 1st rnd pick
A year or so ago I might have agreed with you....but the Canucks have loads of depth on the left side with Juolevi, Brisbebois, Holm, Wiercioch and McEneny....and I just don't see Hutton "as a great skater'....He's fine once he gets going, but his first couple of strides are ponderous.....Continuously gets tracked down from behind and coughs up the puck. But I agree there's still potential there, which might interest another NHL team with defensive depth issues....And at $2.8m a season, he's affordable. Canucks need more youth and size up front imo.Id rather be patient with Hutton hes worth keeping he emerged as an NHL player late and may take another step. Some guys seem to be like that. He has been at times asked to do to much for what he can do but not sure thats on him. He is quite big he is a great skater and at times really knows what to do defensively but seems to get overwhelmed. Some of those problems i think he can work on. Id rather keep him
What do you think Edmonton would offer us for Ben Hutton? Lottery protected first? Prospect and a 2nd?
I don’t trade Tanev for him, I would want significantly more coming back. I also think Tanev is a guy you keep through the rebuild. Gunderbranson will bring in more than expected as dmen at the trade deadline do. Get draft picks now or the deadline when they have the least value and turn those into picks or players at the draft when they have the most value.Where are the Leafs with Liljegren? Would it be worth parting with Tanev if he came back the other way?
A year or so ago I might have agreed with you....but the Canucks have loads of depth on the left side with Juolevi, Brisbebois, Holm, Wiercioch and McEneny....and I just don't see Hutton "as a great skater'....He's fine once he gets going, but his first couple of strides are ponderous.....Continuously gets tracked down from behind and coughs up the puck. But I agree there's still potential there, which might interest another NHL team with defensive depth issues....And at $2.8m a season, he's affordable. Canucks need more youth and size up front imo.
Hutton is very good at transitioning the puck and has very good offensive IQ. He's a middle pairing guy that can give you quality minutes and results. Comparing him to Matt Bartowski shows you know absolutely nothing when it comes to evaluating ice hockey players these players are not similar, at all.Ben Hutton is horrible.
He has below average offensive awareness, below average defensive awareness, muffin of a shot...
Matt Bartkowski v2
Trade him while someone may think he still has some upside.
Ben Hutton is horrible.
He has below average offensive awareness, below average defensive awareness, muffin of a shot...
Matt Bartkowski v2
Trade him while someone may think he still has some upside.
He is not horrible and far from it. Just a struggling season for him right now. He WILL turn it around.