I don't disagree that it's a trade I wouldn't have made, but one for one, in no way is it a lopsided deal. If Team Canada were at the Olympics right now, a healthy Weber would be there and a healthy PK would not. While to some that means nothing, to others it says a lot. Potato/potato
I personally find all the proposals out there moving Price and Weber for prospects and picks are also lopsided because you have proven all-stars and to exchange them for ifs and buts is crazy, yet here we are talking about it as Habs fans.
You're right, to many, that means nothing, including people like David Poile, you know, the guy who traded his captain for the guy who wasn't on Team Canada. Poile actually did this knowing that if Weber retires before his contract ends, it would cost the team a lot of money. And well, the Stanley Cup final appearance after Poile traded his captain for the guy who wasn't on Team Canada says a lot.
Look, you're right, maybe Weber would be on Team Canada for the Olympics and Subban might not. However, why stop there? Maybe Vlasic and Bouwmeester might be too. That proves they are better than Subban right? In fact, in 2014, Chris Kunitz was on Team Canada over Clause Giroux, that proves that Kunitz is better than Giroux, right?
And oh, since Bergevin was one of the guys behind Team Canada's roster in the World Cup Of Hockey tournament, that proves that he shouldn't be fired, right? I mean, why fire him and hire a guy who wasn't part of that team? See how stupid that argument is?
Yeah, we could use individual stats (including analytics) to measure players. We could use individual awards to measure players. We could use team successes to measure players. All of which heavily favours Subban to an embarrassing degree. But no, let's use silly fallacies like "yeah, but Team Canada".
I doubt you will reply, but I look forward to whatever you can come up with next.