Teasdale is better than Fonstad and Hillis.
at 17,
Fonstad - 72-21-52-73 -5 6 pims
Hillis - 60-20-39-59 -12 48 pims
Teasdale - 60-18-29-47 +22 25 pims
at 18,
Fonstad - 67-29-44-73 +32 12 pims
Teasdale - 65-32-33-65 +18 14 pims
Hillis - 33-10-12-22 -10 27 pims
Fonstad has had the better stats, in a tougher league but benefited from being on one of the top teams in the CHL this year.
Teasdale has the edge in size, defensive play, and his style should fit a bottom line well.
Fonstad likely the best skater of the group, Hillis needed to work on his skating and he did, looked improved there so I'd give him the edge over Teasdale.
Hillis is coming off several injuries and a disappointing year that was mainly just a slow start as he turned it on to where he would be around where he was in his age 17 season. I think he's underrated as his passing/playmaking are among the best in our farm system.
Teasdale if he can improve his skating has the more likely chance to see NHL games but I think Hilis has the highest upside of the trio. If Fonstad can improve his strength, add mass, get his nose dirty more, he could be a pretty good prospect for us.
Where these guys are ranked it's real close with all of them, add in McShane who likely has the best shot out of them but like Teasdale the skating and speed need improvement and I don't think McShane works hard enough out there. But the skills are legit.