Possible trade fixes for Red Wings.

[Zetterberg4Captain]

Hell no. Maybe when he was playing at the top of his game again, but he isn't.

Helm has a ton of value in the league, maybe not quite Edler level value, but not too far off.

You throw in those 3 other huge pieces and it's not even close. From what I gather, a lot of Canucks fans don't even view Edler's contract as much of a discount anymore.

that and the fact its more then bobby ryan and rick nash were traded for combined

edler will fetch if moved
-a first rd pick(think 12-30 spot)
- a solid prospect
- a salary dump as edler is signed to good money long-term so money HAS to be exchanged(its the way it works now)

 

[SimplySolace]

that and the fact its more then bobby ryan and rick nash were traded for combined

edler will fetch if moved
-a first rd pick(think 12-30 spot)
- a solid prospect
- a salary dump as edler is signed to good money long-term so money HAS to be exchanged(its the way it works now)

I don't see why KH won't jump on this then. 1st + Quincey/Sammy (might waive to go back to VAN) + Tatar

EDIT: Not enough for cap reasons.. Quincey + Eaves + Tatar + 1st OR Sammy + Tootoo + Tatar + 1st

 

[Zetterberg4Captain]

I don't see why KH won't jump on this then. 1st + Quincey/Sammy (might waive to go back to VAN) + Tatar

well it may not be tatar they want, it may be nyquist or jankrok or mantha and that is probbaly too much to give up for an edler unless you're the pens or bruins or sharks etc who are among the true top cup contenders

 

[TheOtherOne]

had to lol at this.

Helene St. James: Why the Red Wings should trade Kyle Quincey

"Quincey has been mediocre since arriving via trade in February 2012."

Quincey wishes he was mediocre.

 

[TatarTangle]

well it may not be tatar they want, it may be nyquist or jankrok or mantha and that is probbaly too much to give up for an edler unless you're the pens or bruins or sharks etc who are among the true top cup contenders

I think Tatar and Nyquist have equal ceilings so one of them can be traded for someone like Edler. Defensemen like Edler don't exactly grow on trees and improves the team instantly.

Always been high on Tatar but Nyquist seems to be better on the defensive side.

 

[SimplySolace]

What about Ott? Not going to be offensive, but could help the team get more tough for only a 2nd round pick probably.

 

[SimplySolace]

well it may not be tatar they want, it may be nyquist or jankrok or mantha and that is probbaly too much to give up for an edler unless you're the pens or bruins or sharks etc who are among the true top cup contenders

They're looking for a Top-6 FWD and I'd wager Tatar fits that bill.

 

[Detroit Sports*]

I'd trade almost anyone on this roster Not named Dats,Z,Tatar,Nyquist,Helm and DeKeyser...

 

[sully6one]

What about Ott? Not going to be offensive, but could help the team get more tough for only a 2nd round pick probably.

I think you're undervaluing him. It's be at least a 1st

 

[InjuredChoker]

they wanted, according to one of canucks beat writer, tatar+järnkrok+smith+1st at deadline.

holland didn't want to give up on 1st rounder.

deal broken.

 

[InjuredChoker]

I think you're undervaluing him. It's be at least a 1st

i agree. esp. if for wings.

 

[Chance on Chance]

They're looking for a Top-6 FWD and I'd wager Tatar fits that bill.

Ott would be interesting and should be available. I think the Canucks would want a winger with some size and grit though instead of Tatar

 

[Zetterberg4Captain]

they wanted, according to one of canucks beat writer, tatar+järnkrok+smith+1st at deadline.

holland didn't want to give up on 1st rounder.

deal broken.

if true thats terrible

thats more then bobby ryan fetched and even more then rick nash both of whom are actual NHL all-stars

 

[Zetterberg4Captain]

They're looking for a Top-6 FWD and I'd wager Tatar fits that bill.

if vancouver came to me and said edler for quincey, tatar and a 1st i would accept

 

[InjuredChoker]

if vancouver came to me and said edler for quincey, tatar and a 1st i would accept

hell yeah.

 

[NyquistIsMyGod*]

I really don't want to move Tatar at all. A defenseman may be needed this season, but he's 23 years old and is looking great. Not many "rookies" on this team have posted a .50 PPG in the past. He could hit the .60 mark this season. Then you look at all of the near NHL ready prospects coming up, a solid 1-3 in Kronwall, Ericsson and DeKeyser.. Keeping Tatar is what we should do.

 

[waltdetroit]

i really don't want to move tatar at all. A defenseman may be needed this season, but he's 23 years old and is looking great. Not many "rookies" on this team have posted a .50 ppg in the past. He could hit the .60 mark this season. Then you look at all of the near nhl ready prospects coming up, a solid 1-3 in kronwall, ericsson and dekeyser.. Keeping tatar is what we should do.

ditto

 

[Vladdy84]

Stop including Tatar in trades unless a top pairing d-man or forward is coming back.

 

[lilidk]

we don't need to trade anybody , just ask polite Cleary, Bert and Semmy to retire. We can got some players from best AHL team

 

[Zetterberg4Captain]

Stop including Tatar in trades unless a top pairing d-man or forward is coming back.

i think edler might be worth moving tatar, though its debatable for sure

 

[NyquistIsMyGod*]

Worth wise, Tatar would be in for Alex Edler. Edler's a damn good defenseman. We have many kids coming up on the backend, a great 1-3, and we actually really need Tatar. I don't see a point.

 

[Vladdy84]

Worth wise, Tatar would be in for Alex Edler. Edler's a damn good defenseman. We have many kids coming up on the backend, a great 1-3, and we actually really need Tatar. I don't see a point.

Edler was a damn good d-man a couple years ago. If he was so damn good, why would the Canucks really want to move him? He's on a good deal. I've heard pretty of Nuck fans complain about Edler. I'm not packaging Tatar, a 1st, Smith + for Edler.

 

[The Zetterberg Era]

Edler was a damn good d-man a couple years ago. If he was so damn good, why would the Canucks really want to move him? He's on a good deal. I've heard pretty of Nuck fans complain about Edler. I'm not packaging Tatar, a 1st, Smith + for Edler.

I think Vancouver is probably really unhappy they basically turned that down at the draft. Thank God they did.

 

[NyquistIsMyGod*]

Edler was a damn good d-man a couple years ago. If he was so damn good, why would the Canucks really want to move him? He's on a good deal. I've heard pretty of Nuck fans complain about Edler. I'm not packaging Tatar, a 1st, Smith + for Edler.

Not real difficult, dude. They lack offensive depth, have a piss poor system, and let's not forget they have Garrison, Hamhuis and Bieksa. Edler seems to be the odd-man out of the group.

 

[Vladdy84]

Not real difficult, dude. They lack offensive depth, have a piss poor system, and let's not forget they have Garrison, Hamhuis and Bieksa. Edler seems to be the odd-man out of the group.

And the Wings don't? The Sedins, Kesler, Burrows and Booth is pretty legit. Also have Horvat on the way. Garrison sucks. If Edler is the odd-man out of THAT group. Then the Wings don't want him.