GDT: PO #3 | Penguins at FLYERS | Sun., April 15, 2018, 3:00 pm ET | NBC, CBC, TVA Sports

Status
Not open for further replies.

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
82,077
140,103
Philadelphia, PA

The statement is foolish regardless. One player isn’t changing your fortune with winning a Stanley Cup or not. It’s hard to win one in general no matter who you are. You can have a contending caliber roster & still not win a championship in hockey.

Voracek hasn’t played well this playoff series or the last one but that can be said about everyone too. This team isn’t very good & has a moronic coaching staff. If those guys don’t play well we’re screwed. Last series went six games & this one will likely go five or six too. It’s still not a large sample to pull from. They’re not the only players to have tough playoff series before & wont be the last. They just don’t have much rope to potentially redeem themselves as the standard needs to high & right off the bat for this team to succeed.

If you’re trading Voracek, you might as trade Giroux too as it’s not like he’s playing well if that’s your justification for moving on. Long term you’re just setting the window back some more as we just squeezed into the playoffs which we needed every bit of Voracek’s production to do so. We’ve basically been rebuilding for this entire decade. How much further do we want to go?
 

Lindberg

Bennyflyers16 get a life
Oct 5, 2013
7,159
7,865
I'll extend Hakstol some credit here. He didn't do too much wrong to cause the team to lose. This team took way too many bad penalties and couldn't convert on any of their PP chances. Filppula, Simmonds, Voracek and Lehtera were a complete disaster.Why Raffl is still on the top line is beyond me though. The Flyers had some good pressure early on but got slaughtered with the PP goals.
 

Protest

C`est La Vie
Mar 28, 2008
7,410
1,269
Deptford, NJ
The statement is foolish regardless. One player isn’t changing your fortune with winning a Stanley Cup or not. It’s hard to win one in general no matter who you are. You can have a contending caliber roster & still not win a championship in hockey.

Voracek hasn’t played well this playoff series or the last one but that can be said about everyone too. This team isn’t very good & has a moronic coaching staff. If those guys don’t play well we’re screwed. Last series went six games & this one will likely go five or six too. It’s still not a large sample to pull from. They’re not the only players to have tough playoff series before & wont be the last. They just don’t have much rope to potentially redeem themselves as the standard needs to high & right off the bat for this team to succeed.

If you’re trading Voracek, you might as trade Giroux too as it’s not like he’s playing well if that’s your justification for moving on. Long term you’re just setting the window back some more as we just squeezed into the playoffs which we needed every bit of Voracek’s production to do so. We’ve basically been rebuilding for this entire decade. How much further do we want to go?

You're assuming trading Voracek will automatically make the team worse and not accounting for anything that the flyers would get it return or potential players they could add with his cap space.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gertbfrobe16

Lindberg

Bennyflyers16 get a life
Oct 5, 2013
7,159
7,865
You're assuming trading Voracek will automatically make the team worse and not accounting for anything that the flyers would get it return or potential players they could add with his cap space.

The likelihood of getting a player like Voracek back isn't realistic. He's one of the best wingers in the game even with all of his warts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JojoTheWhale

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
37,593
155,838
Huron of the Lakes
You're assuming trading Voracek will automatically make the team worse and not accounting for anything that the flyers would get it return or potential players they could add with his cap space.

Because point/game players in their primes under contract don't grow on trees. It's a very fair assumption. I'm sure Toronto won the Kessel trade too. Can't win with Phil.
 

FlyTimmo

pit <3
Jul 10, 2013
12,430
10,461
The statement is foolish regardless. One player isn’t changing your fortune with winning a Stanley Cup or not. It’s hard to win one in general no matter who you are. You can have a contending caliber roster & still not win a championship in hockey.

Voracek hasn’t played well this playoff series or the last one but that can be said about everyone too. This team isn’t very good & has a moronic coaching staff. If those guys don’t play well we’re screwed. Last series went six games & this one will likely go five or six too. It’s still not a large sample to pull from. They’re not the only players to have tough playoff series before & wont be the last. They just don’t have much rope to potentially redeem themselves as the standard needs to high & right off the bat for this team to succeed.

If you’re trading Voracek, you might as trade Giroux too as it’s not like he’s playing well if that’s your justification for moving on. Long term you’re just setting the window back some more as we just squeezed into the playoffs which we needed every bit of Voracek’s production to do so. We’ve basically been rebuilding for this entire decade. How much further do we want to go?

One player can definitely change your fortune.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
128,105
166,050
Armored Train
Compare the rosters.

We've covered this. Your logic is that coaching is less relevant than the rosters.

If that's true why did these teams finish close in the standings? Why is Hakstol 1-6 in games against Sullivan?

Your quest to pretend coaching isn't important to minimize blame on Hakstol is very poorly thought out. I mean, to be consistent with yourself, you'd have to give all the credit for making the playoffs to the players rather than Hakstol, which actually puts you in the opposite camp from what you claim.
 

Captain Dave Poulin

Imaginary Cat
Apr 30, 2015
68,304
200,482
Tokyo, JP
One thing I will say about Jake is that, unlike some of the ridiculous complaints and main board threads we see on here, I can understand people who scream at him - his play is not very easy on the eyes a lot of the time and it's easy to understand how his bad moments linger in people's minds. It's a struggle sometimes not to want to fire him into the Sun. He wears a brilliant Keystone Cops/Clark Kent camouflage.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
Voracek isn't a good fit with Patrick because Voracek is "puck dominant," that is, his game is predicated on puck control, and that means Patrick, who is going to be a better player, doesn't handle the puck enough.

Giroux is also puck dominant, but Couts doesn't need the puck. And Giroux doesn't hold the puck, he's always looking to pass before skating with it.

Patrick, with his skating, puck handling and shooting, should be handling the puck the majority of his ice time because like most top centers, he can do more with it than his linemates. And he has the vision and instincts to set up his wings.

And I suspect the same will apply to Frost.
 

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
82,077
140,103
Philadelphia, PA
You're assuming trading Voracek will automatically make the team worse and not accounting for anything that the flyers would get it return or potential players they could add with his cap space.

I mean the odds aren’t in your favor to do so. Like it or not the large size of the contract is going to eat away at your return. Add in Hextall’s shoddy record of acquiring NHL players & im even less convinced it will be something worth pursuing from a Flyers standpoint.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain Dave Poulin

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
128,105
166,050
Armored Train
One thing I will say about Jake is that, unlike some of the ridiculous complaints and main board threads we see on here, I can understand people who scream at him - his play is not very easy on the eyes a lot of the time and it's easy to understand how his bad moments linger in people's minds. It's a struggle sometimes not to want to fire him into the Sun. He wears a brilliant Keystone Cops/Clark Kent camouflage.

I see a lot of Filppula in his future. The guy who does all kinds of awesome stuff and then ruins it at the end with some awful play.


Though for most of this year Flip hasn't even shown much skill anymore, either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • USA vs Sweden
    USA vs Sweden
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $1,217.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Finland vs Czechia
    Finland vs Czechia
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $400.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Augsburg vs VfB Stuttgart
    Augsburg vs VfB Stuttgart
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $1,000.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Frosinone vs Inter Milan
    Frosinone vs Inter Milan
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $150.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Alavés vs Girona
    Alavés vs Girona
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $22.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad