PensFanSince1989
Registered User
- Oct 25, 2008
- 10,578
- 40
Vokoun was playing really well up until he faced Philly. Then he just started leaving steaming piles of poop on the ice.
Really well? No.
Vokoun was playing really well up until he faced Philly. Then he just started leaving steaming piles of poop on the ice.
Vokoun was playing really well up until he faced Philly. Then he just started leaving steaming piles of poop on the ice.
Really well? No.
I don't want to rag on Vokoun that much because despite his past 2 starts, I do think he's a good goalie to have on the roster. My beef was with the poster trying to blame Bylsma for Vokoun's play, trying to claim that Vokoun somehow deserved more ice time. Vokoun has, apart from his past 2 starts, been a very capable backup. But nothing he's done so far has said that he should be getting more time in the net than he's already getting, especially considering how solid Fleury has been so far (fingers crossed). Overall, I'm still of the belief that no goalie would be able to get comfortable playing net during Flyers-Pens games when they get like they did last week so O don't even put that game on Vokoun.Ok, maybe that was a slight exaggeration. Well enough to have a winning record?
In Vokoun's 7 starts, he's allowed 3 or more goals in 6 of them. If that was Fleury, you'd be ripping him a new one for it.
I don't want to rag on Vokoun that much because despite his past 2 starts, I do think he's a good goalie to have on the roster. My beef was with the poster trying to blame Bylsma for Vokoun's play, trying to claim that Vokoun somehow deserved more ice time. Vokoun has, apart from his past 2 starts, been a very capable backup. But nothing he's done so far has said that he should be getting more time in the net than he's already getting, especially considering how solid Fleury has been so far (fingers crossed). Overall, I'm still of the belief that no goalie would be able to get comfortable playing net during Flyers-Pens games when they get like they did last week so O don't even put that game on Vokoun.
The Pens really need to find Letang a stay at home partner that can bail him out on some of those bad pinches etc. Niskanen just isn't that type of D-Man. He's a good player that adds some puck moving and depth scoring to the D group but he was better served last year with a stay at home D like Engelland and Letang will be better served with someone else too. Finding something affordable that fits is the problem but I think Regehr fits the bill if/when he becomes available as a rental.
I would caution calling Florida a bottom of the barrel team. I've watched plenty of their games and other posters have pointed out how well they've done this year staying in games. They grind it out and make it interesting, but don't have the overall talent to win more than they lose. The other day, it took a BS powerplay for Boston to gain the upperhand. I also watched them battle Tampa in a similar shootout just like this.Probably late on this but....
- To the whole team (I could see excluding Pauly M) for this awful, awful showing. Getting shellacked by a one trick, bottom of the barrel team is no way to get teams to respect or fear playing you. The whole group should be embarrassed after this junk contest. We better come out flying Thursday to make up for playing like idiots and taking penalty after penalty like some goon squad.
- Me for still being this angry over the game. I also blame my wet shoe/sock combination and now sitting at work trying to get them to dry.
...and if we had had Fleury in the game from the start today, I bet that you and the most persistent Fleury fans would be busy describing how in actual fact only the Campbell goal was a should have.... and that was a snipe in any case.
...and I would agree! Doesn't mean Vokoun looked good today, but the culprits were Letang and less so Niskanen on three of the four PP goals; every bit as much as it was Letang/Niskanen when Fleischmann got the winner on Fleury.
Great leadership from a guy with an ARossi just asked Orpik whats wrong with the PK. Orpiik answer I dunno
Can't our Captain step up get on guys for bad play/decisions. You know, the roll of Captain isn't just about how you play yourself, but getting the best out of your teammates......including their mental game.
And here's my counter, even though I'm not entirely disagreeing with you.
In no particular order:
1) Our grinders and so called physical players aren't big.
2) The team, under orders from up top, have completely dialed down their physical play because they backed themselves into a corner by spouting off after the brawl game, the Crosby concussion and the Cooke incidents.
3) Our wingers are simply okay, and are more ideally suited to be third wheels on scoring lines. Even Neal, who is a lethal weapon with his shot, isn't really that noticeable until he scores. Thank God he scores a lot.
4) Staal, who covered up for a LOT of the lack of depth at wing, is no longer here. Instead we have a guy who's more ideally suited to be a third line checker, and nothing more.
Essentially, we have exactly TWO players on the roster that the offense can flow through. No matter how good they are, it's not enough, and as I mentioned a few weeks ago, the difference between Malkin/Crosby and i.e. Kane/Toews is but a few slivers, and not the wide gulf that separated Lemieux or even Jagr from the next best player in the League. Just look at the play that Sharp made on Hossa's (sigh) game winner in OT last night, and it's a perfect example of how little of that is on this team unless Malkin and Crosby play together.
We're not big enough to be the physical or grinding team they claim to be, and we're not quite skilled enough to be a finesse team. Add some erratic goaltending to the mix, and coaching issues aside, I'm sometimes surprised that they win as often as they do.
This team has no identity,Sorry to chop off a lot of your post, but the bolded above is something I've also noticed and why I think this team is kind of in no man's land, and why I'm so skeptical about the chances of seeing another Cup with this current roster.
Our collection of forwards are too small to be an effective physical club that punishes the opposition and really wears teams down, but they're also not skilled enough to play a "Detroit Red Wings" puck possession game. So the result is a team that's sort of ... neither a physical, grinding defensive club nor an offensive threat everytime they're on the ice (except when out Big Two go into God mode).
If Shero wanted to build a team based on speed, puck movement, and quick strike offense, the collection of forwards he's assembled were the wrong ones. If Shero wanted to build a team that punished the opposing defense and was generally a chore to play against, again, he needed to bring in a lot more size and physicality than he has.
You look at a team like the Bruins and you know exactly what they're trying to assemble there. You look at the Red Wings over the past decade and again, you know what kind of style they want to play. Ditto a team like the Devils. Then there's the Penguins, whose identity is basically "they've got the two best players in the world".
I mean, seriously, what kind of team are the Pens?
Its just a game,relax, you win some you lose some.
And here's my counter, even though I'm not entirely disagreeing with you.
In no particular order:
1) Our grinders and so called physical players aren't big.
2) The team, under orders from up top, have completely dialed down their physical play because they backed themselves into a corner by spouting off after the brawl game, the Crosby concussion and the Cooke incidents.
3) Our wingers are simply okay, and are more ideally suited to be third wheels on scoring lines. Even Neal, who is a lethal weapon with his shot, isn't really that noticeable until he scores. Thank God he scores a lot.
4) Staal, who covered up for a LOT of the lack of depth at wing, is no longer here. Instead we have a guy who's more ideally suited to be a third line checker, and nothing more.
Essentially, we have exactly TWO players on the roster that the offense can flow through. No matter how good they are, it's not enough, and as I mentioned a few weeks ago, the difference between Malkin/Crosby and i.e. Kane/Toews is but a few slivers, and not the wide gulf that separated Lemieux or even Jagr from the next best player in the League. Just look at the play that Sharp made on Hossa's (sigh) game winner in OT last night, and it's a perfect example of how little of that is on this team unless Malkin and Crosby play together.
We're not big enough to be the physical or grinding team they claim to be, and we're not quite skilled enough to be a finesse team. Add some erratic goaltending to the mix, and coaching issues aside, I'm sometimes surprised that they win as often as they do.
I would caution calling Florida a bottom of the barrel team. I've watched plenty of their games and other posters have pointed out how well they've done this year staying in games. They grind it out and make it interesting, but don't have the overall talent to win more than they lose. The other day, it took a BS powerplay for Boston to gain the upperhand. I also watched them battle Tampa in a similar shootout just like this.
Give them some credit. They scrap/claw for points and wins.
Its just a game,relax, you win some you lose some.
This roster, as is, is good enough to win a Cup. I guarantee it. The coaches could be preaching all the right stuff, but the words are not sticking. Same thing happened w/ MT. When you stay undisciplined, continue to lose leads, can't maintain momentum, etc... it becomes a problem. All of these things are CONSISTENT problems. Yes - it's the players messing up. We get that. But you can't fire every player. You need someone to get the message across.
Look what happened when a simple message changed between MT and DB. The team went from being blown out against Toronto to being the most resilient Pens team I've ever seen. It happens in hockey. It happens in real life. The message needs to be there.
Do you think the players are responding to the coaches? And what would you suggest changes that?
Funny thing is that when Vokoun played for the Capitals last year people all thought that because they finally had a solid goaltender at such a low cap hit they'd be a contender. He ended up not performing to par and left. I kind've feel that he's lost his mojo. We have him on hook for next season to so maybe he'll do better in a long season?
Yesterday had to be one of the worst d games I've ever seen though. I want to analyse our PK and PP but I think I'd be too pissed off to do so. Will give it a try though.
And this is a hockey board where we discuss every aspect of the game. In fact - that's what the post-game threads are for.
Look, if we were just getting blown out from the drop of the puck, and looked bad for 60 minutes, then I would agree that they were tuning out DB. However, they usually come out ready to play, and jump out to a lot of leads. That is usually the sign that the coaches still have their respect and response.
I agree that you can't fire all of the players.....but you can fire one. Shero traded a piece of our core away in Whitney in 2009. Don't you think that sends a message. What if we moved someone like Orpik, or Letang? Do you think that would send a message? Take it one step further...what if that trade of say Orpik, was in a deal that gets Perry in return. Does that change the dynamic at all?
perhaps some of the explanation for Vokoun's play is he isn't as accustomed as Fleury is to the ridiculous chances you face courtesy of your own team
Vokoun has always been a goalie that looks better the more work you give him. Vokoun was unquestionably playing better the first ~10 games the penguins played this year. He looked calm was playing the puck,etc. Dunno what happened but he's flopping on the ice like a fish now, I've never seen him do that, ever. I guess Meloche has done his work...
That said, the biggest thing I don't like is that Crosby needs to step up and call his teammates out. He's not necessarily their friend, he's their Captain first. When is the last time Crosby has called for a team meeting to tell his teammates to get their heads out of their *****? I can't recall one ever.
+++Martin, wow if this guy keeps playing like this he will get some consideration in Norris trophy talks. He's playing that good right now.
-Sutter? What happened, perhaps the offensive black hole (aka TK) has pulled him in. But the guy can't shoot/score to save his life right now.
+Jeffrey. It's not always pretty, but all he does is score goals and play sound hockey. I'd love to see this guy get a full season with the pens.
--Niskanen + Letang. This pairing is garbage. Two small guys that get pushed around. Our defensive lineup should be. Letang-Despres, Martin-Orpik, Bortuzzo-England. I know Niskanane skill wise is better the Despres/Bortuzzo (now) but it's about chemistry and how we match up. I'd much rather see him traded as part of a move for a good winger.
+Bennett, If you watch this kid he is always anticipating the play and in the right spot. His skating is definitely better then what I expected. He won't break out until next season I think but we have a gem here.
Except everyone just turns into. FIRE BYLSMA.