KIRK
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 109,700
- 51,216
MJ is far from perfect but I have a little hope that the team can get their **** together quickly with the right roster/coach. I see an actual accountable team. That's strange. There are a lot of times I see a Penguin get hooked/slashed or something and they don't do anything. They just keep going. Under DB we would have slashed and been a bunch of ****ing babies.
It's not for want of their heads being in the right place or for want of effort.
On defense, you've got Paul Martin and 5 guys who arguably wouldn't be among the six starting defensemen on at least half the teams in the playoffs.
Up front, you've got 2/3 of a top line that could tilt the ice against anyone (too bad hockey isn't an individual sport) and the one guy who when healthy really puts fear into the Rangers so banged up that he's go no burst on the forecheck and backcheck and actually is afraid to wind it up for fear that he lacks the speed/leverage to keep the puck (which is borne out the rare time he goes for it anyway).
I don't care how badly you want it or how smart you play it or how well your coach is doing, if the other team is deeper and plays desperate and responsible and the other team's coach eschews arrogance in favor of adjustments and the rules are called the way they are . . .
You know, I'd like to be pissed about the way this one turned out, but I'm not sure how much more you can ask given what the Pens can put out right now when that Rangers team comes to play.
People who think this series is being called evenly and the penalty discrepancy is where it's at purely because of a lack of Pens discipline are delusional.
That's a penalty by any measure and it happened right in front of the ref, in a series where the calls have been overwhelmingly against the Pens. How do you not call that?
It could be worth a try, but I kind of like having a bottom 6 that's worth a ****. Lappy's actually made our 4th line a threat. Without Adams! Imagine that.
Not saying he would be, but he COULD be this year's Talbot.
One adjustment I'd look to make in terms of the lines: Right now, Malkin lacks the burst and leverage in 1 on 1 battles to be a force defensively or on the forecheck. You've got to get him out there with two guys who will ease that burden. If it means playing with Lappy with him or maybe sometimes on Sutter's wing (I hate this one, but Sutter needs someone to get him the puck and this is one area where Malkin's offensive game isn't lacking right now) or maybe both on the same shift, MJ has to adapt a little better to where Malkin physically is now beyond protecting him on draw locations. With Perron hurt and Malkin hurt, the Pens lack a forechecker save Horny who could do anything to help those two sustain possession . . .
I'd split Malkin and Perron, not because they wouldn't be good together when healthy, but because they're struggling defensively and on the forecheck where both are hurt at the same time.
Last edited: