HawksBeerFan
Registered User
- Nov 9, 2014
- 5,667
- 2,515
When was the last time they were either of those things?Oh sorry, are we talking about relevancy or quality? I got confused.
When was the last time they were either of those things?Oh sorry, are we talking about relevancy or quality? I got confused.
When was the last time they were either of those things?
That's not an answer to the questionNobody is excusing the stupidity of some of their choices. Goin all in on a bad goalie like Darling and getting rid of a great coach like Peters were obviously set-backs.
That's not an answer to the question
That wasn't the question (and wasn't even the original point either), but whatever helps ya sleep at night!Ok. They're higher quality than the Blackhawks right now.
By literally every single metric available, simple or 'fancy'.
Better?
That wasn't the question (and wasn't even the original point either), but whatever helps ya sleep at night!
I'd sleep better at night knowing the Blackhawks are going for a high pick that could actually make an impact, rather than a pointless playoff exit and weaker prospect.
Oh sorry, are we talking about relevancy or quality? I got confused.
Ok. They're higher quality than the Blackhawks right now.
By literally every single metric available, simple or 'fancy'.
Better?
Better than the Hawks this season and the last for sure but I doubt they are better next season or seasons after. They are just middling team with good advanced numbers. At some point you have to realize that they are not as good as their numbers indicated and not just unlucky.
Carolina on paper has been pretenders for years. They're the perfect example of why to throw out the numbers you read on paper. I'd take the current Hawks team over Canes in a playoff round every time. Shut down Aho and they're half way there already.
Analytics is best used to explain performance ... not the other way around. Analytics can't account for the human influence. At the core, hockey is pretty simple:You know I don't agree with the bold because I believe they are an important tool that can lead to important issues. We differ there but always have.
I think the Canes great numbers actually show their flaw, they have too much of one thing. Possession players are great but you need the Kane type players to win in my opinion.
I seem to remember a certain predators team the went hot towards the end of the season and got in as the 8 seed.
Their banners still hang in raptors.
Analytics is best used to explain performance ... not the other way around. Analytics can't account for the human influence. At the core, hockey is pretty simple:
1. Put pucks into the opponent's net.
2. Stop pucks from going into your own net.
If you can't do the basic fundamentals, analaytics mean poop.
You know I don't agree with the bold because I believe they are an important tool that can lead to important issues. We differ there but always have. You and JD are the polar opposite. JD believes the numbers are everything and you don't see any value. It is part of what makes this board interesting.
I think the Canes great numbers actually show their flaw, they have too much of one thing. Possession players are great but you need the Kane type players to win in my opinion.
I seem to remember a certain predators team the went hot towards the end of the season and got in as the 8 seed.
Their banners still hang in rafters.
It appears Stan got the top five pick. I hate to do this but Strome really has changed the dynamic with this team.Early in the season I was all for tanking and ushering in the next generation to hopefully help Kane/Toews win a cup in 3-5 years, because, well the team sucked and was horrible to watch, but then Strome/Cat (and JC?) happened and they ARE the next generation and helping Kane/Toews win a cup has been moved to present-5 years.
Why keep waiting? A top pick this year isn't going to help the team now and maybe never will, but the current youth is already helping the team.
Actually, not so fast Kowalski
I do see plenty of value in numbers but I despise when they are thrown around without witnessing what those numbers are trying to represent. Sometimes they can be dam accurate but not always.
I saw a good deal of the Canes games last season and I can tell you they were not very good.... and that is why in that particular case throw those numbers out. This season I haven't seen them as much but when I have they are pretty much a one man team on offense and still quite often leave their goalie to fend for himself.
Fair enough but in the past you have been rather dismissive.