I thought before the replay they might call Pulisic for interfering with Fabianski as that is how it looked first glance. But he barely touched him if he did.Don't see why it wouldn't?
I thought before the replay they might call Pulisic for interfering with Fabianski as that is how it looked first glance. But he barely touched him if he did.Don't see why it wouldn't?
Any interest in commenting on the Silva incident that you gave an expansive "" to either, or no?
Big Club bias is not controversial.
Yeah, we just want oligarch money to prop up those delusions like you lot.If I were to watch the replay again, I would lose my spot in the live stream. I'll watch after the match and get back to you.
West Ham are so funny to me, because they harbour a thousand and one delusions about being a big club and then whine and whine about how small they are when they feel something's not going their way
Yeah, we just want oil money to prop up those delusions like you lot.
West Ham were a bigger club before oil money took the soul out of Chelsea anyway.
And?West Ham were literally relegated the year before Roman took over
They still had more fans, history and consistent good teams in the top flight. Chelsea had 6 relegations in the 20th century, so don't go there.West Ham were literally relegated the year before Roman took over
When your takes are indistinguishable from AB13, you may want reevaluate what you are saying.Yeah, we just want oligarch money to prop up those delusions like you lot.
And the Silva clip is right here in the thread. Whenever you're ready.
"Delusional"When your takes are indistinguishable from AB13, you may want reevaluate what you are saying.
This is false, look at where Chelsea and West Ham finished pre Roman. Ill save you the work of looking it up. They are pretty similar pre 2003.West Ham were a bigger club before oil money took the soul out of Chelsea anyway.
Chelsea could really use a win here.
Anyway, Tottenham has only won one of its last 5 PL games, so maybe that conversation about how consistent they are was a little premature?
We're only 11 points back!!!There's still hope for St Totteringham's yet!
I genuinely have no idea why you always talk about where team's supporters are from. You use 'we' to reference West Ham as someone from what I can only assume is Jersey. Does this really add anything to the discussion?Nothing more exemplifies Chelsea more than some guy in Halifax talking about other supporters delusions of being a big club.
They were comparable clubs really. What West Ham should really be upset about is that they have fallen behind clubs like Leicester, Everton, Wolves, etc. despite having arguably more resources.This is false, look at where Chelsea and West Ham finished pre Roman. Ill save you the work of looking it up.
Chelsea Stats and History | FBref.com
List of Chelsea F.C. seasons - Wikipedia
West Ham United Stats and History | FBref.com
List of West Ham United F.C. seasons - Wikipedia
Those stats don’t say everything but they show little difference. West Ham however had a bunch of legendary players and a ” world cup win” and a lot more fans, so they were a bigger club.This is false, look at where Chelsea and West Ham finished pre Roman. Ill save you the work of looking it up. They are pretty similar pre 2003.
Chelsea Stats and History | FBref.com
List of Chelsea F.C. seasons - Wikipedia
West Ham United Stats and History | FBref.com
List of West Ham United F.C. seasons - Wikipedia