So the ball hitting your arms in the air on a free kick isn't a penalty? Or is shielding your face considered a natural position?
Very similar to barcas version of this
No way they can let Iheanacho continue. Guy got absolutely wrecked.
That has to be a red for Ederson.
Didn't even try to play the ball, just took him out.
Hilarious. He doesn't even get close to the ball and just takes out Iheanacho. If a player took him out like that it's a penalty 100% of the time, goalies shouldn't get special treatment to just clean out attacking players with impunity.no way in a million years is that a red or a penalty. Ederson is going for the ball he didnt initiate contact. Just a collision
They do though just like defenders with the ball do when attackers go for a challenge.Hilarious. He doesn't even get close to the ball and just takes out Iheanacho. If a player took him out like that it's a penalty 100% of the time, goalies shouldn't get special treatment to just clean out attacking players with impunity.
no way in a million years is that a red or a penalty. Ederson is going for the ball he didnt initiate contact. Just a collision
Meaning he didnt go for his head but for the ballJust a collision? I guess every tackle is "just a collision".
"Go for a challenge" as if that's what the attacking player did here. Iheanacho is in the air on the ball and Ederson jumps into him.They do though just like defenders with the ball do when attackers go for a challenge.
No one said he "went for his head".Meaning he didnt go for his head but for the ball
Re read my post.... thats not what i said"Go for a challenge" as if that's what the attacking player did here. Iheanacho is in the air on the ball and Ederson jumps into him.
Meaning he didnt go for his head but for the ball
That is the point though, they shouldn't. Shouldn't be allowed to whack someone in the face legally cause they are the keeper.Drogba got a punch to the face on a similar play... nothing was called but offside. Keeper usually gets the call here
It happened before not called it happened again not called hmmm maybe because thats the rule lolSo because something happened that was probably called the wrong way 10 years ago this isn´t a penalty? I´m struggling to follow the logic here.
The explanation they gave:It is usually an offence if a player:
- touches the ball with their hand/arm when:
- the hand/arm has made their body unnaturally bigger
- the hand/arm is above/beyond their shoulder level (unless the player deliberately plays the ball which then touches their hand/arm)
• having the hand/arm above shoulder height is rarely a ‘natural’ position and a player is ‘taking a risk’ by having the hand/arm in that position, including when sliding
So if you can find any single example of something called a certain way in the past, that justifies how it's called in the current game? Incredible take.It happened before not called it happened again not called hmmm maybe because thats the rule lol
If Ederson has gotten the worst of it, people would have been screaming bloody murder.I disagree. He’s not even looking at the ball and he knows he can’t get to it.